Active Users:763 Time:03/04/2025 05:27:57 AM
It's how they're used and by whom Cannoli Send a noteboard - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM
I'm not some literary analyst or good at picking out details, and this is one of the few definite things I can say bothers me about Sanderson's writing. It's got nothing to do with the word itself so much as how it's used and Sanderson uses it where the same character would say "man" or "woman".

WoT has a very strong sense of gender identity, and Sanderson has completely missed that, retaining the modern usage.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1575 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 367 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 737 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1269 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 947 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 978 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 334 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 881 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 372 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 695 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 961 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 797 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1042 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 885 Views

Reply to Message