Active Users:336 Time:28/04/2025 03:27:42 AM
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM
Of all the Sandersonisms we have had to become accustomed to in the past 2.1 books, that one is the absolute worst. I have seen it in other authors who have been unable to narrate in a suitably archaic voice (Goodkind comes to mind), but it's even worse with WoT, because it pretty much flies in the face of all the difference-between-sexes thematic stuff in the entire series. It is awkward, it is stupid, it is anachronistic, and more than any single other difference from Jordan's writing, it yanks you out of the story!

This is the fruits of a generation of political correctness - simpleminded people who are so conditioned to reflexively be gender-inclusive that one such is unable to break the habits when attempting to write a book series set in a different era of societal development, or when attempting to be true to the spirit of a writer he claims to respect.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!! - 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM 1586 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM* - 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM 373 Views
Re: Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? - 20/09/2012 07:41:36 PM 753 Views
Tell me, honestly. - 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM 1281 Views
Contractions - 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM 959 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM 989 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM* - 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM 339 Views
Oh Terez... - 20/09/2012 09:07:32 AM 890 Views
Yes, it's called disdain for trollery *NM* - 20/09/2012 09:12:21 AM 375 Views
Oh Terez, - 20/09/2012 04:29:52 PM 705 Views
That's ... actually not entirely correct. - 20/09/2012 06:53:03 AM 970 Views
I did notice that on my reread - 20/09/2012 07:19:57 AM 809 Views
It's how they're used and by whom - 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM 1052 Views
Oh Cannoli, - 20/09/2012 05:26:34 AM 895 Views

Reply to Message