Active Users:847 Time:15/11/2024 02:16:34 PM
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. Datakim Send a noteboard - 20/06/2012 06:57:50 PM
You only addressed half the argument. That being said, I think the stone is more symbolic than anything else, anyway.


Err what? You mean the idea that DO can only control a limited amount of things at once? That would not prevent the DO from influencing the WT, then the BT then Caemlyn and so on, depending on where his influence would do the most harm. Having SG-stone in all major cities would allow the DO to choose which place to influence, and change the location of that influence at will. Right now for example, the White Tower would be a far better place for the DO to focus his attention on than the Black Tower.

You are probably right about it being just symbolic though. It seems unlikely that Sanderson would have told us if its going to play a role in the coming book.
Reply to message
So apparently the palace at the Black Tower is made of Shayol Ghul stone... - 23/05/2012 12:57:37 AM 2172 Views
I saw that too, but how is that even possible?? - 23/05/2012 03:02:57 AM 1166 Views
Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 03:32:59 AM 1185 Views
That is good logic, but the flip side is: Why would RJ bother to specify that if it were minutiae? - 23/05/2012 11:22:24 AM 1016 Views
Re: Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 02:43:28 PM 903 Views
Re: Not the palace... - 23/05/2012 08:30:46 PM 951 Views
My initial thoughts on it had to do with the properties of SG. - 23/05/2012 10:58:21 PM 859 Views
Taim always a darkfriend? - 28/05/2012 01:17:34 AM 1080 Views
If SG rocks have special properties... - 28/05/2012 01:28:28 AM 828 Views
Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 18/06/2012 12:31:48 PM 737 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 19/06/2012 05:42:21 AM 882 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 19/06/2012 06:51:02 AM 736 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 20/06/2012 06:57:50 PM 793 Views
Re: Blightfortress, Towers of Midnight, etc. - 24/06/2012 10:34:14 AM 758 Views

Reply to Message