Active Users:405 Time:22/12/2024 11:53:55 PM
Generally, I think both her means AND ends were correct; reconciling them was the challenge. - Edit 1

Before modification by Joel at 30/05/2012 04:16:12 AM

Which she met well, IMHO.
she also had valid reasons for each of them, and most served, rather than undermined, Andors interests.
Of such things is the road to hell paved.

Not just good intentions, but good results, legitimately achieved. There is little to condemn there; less able/scrupulous rulers could abuse any or all Elaynes ends and means, but that applies to any ends and means. The issue is a bit broader than Elaynes conduct as Andors monarch, but legitimate powers potential for illegitimate abuse amply justifies strong public oversight and accountability, without justifying anarchy.


Not to personalize it,
Don't worry about. I started it.

Yes, but of THOSE things do flame-wars consist. I do not mind flame-wars, as such, except that they are counterproductive bandwidth wastes.

but I cannot help suspecting this (and your comments about literary feminism, though I concede Jordan overcompensates too often) is the crux of the problem: Not what Elayne did, but her cooperation with Egwene.
Duh. Should I not have been more clear? And I don't mean with the character of Egwene (though that's a whole other can of worms), but with the office of the Amyrlin Seat.

Fine, but criticisms of the Amyrlin, either the office or its occupant, belong there, not with any one Aes Sedai/ruler circumstance forces to operate amid and despite the Amyrlins influential failings. If that is cause to condemn Elayne, virtually all Westlands rulers are guilty twice or even thrice over: During the WTs civil war, each repeatedly refused to commit to either side, desperately trying to preserve relations with both until the eventual triumph of one clarified.

Rather than prostrating Andor to Tar Valon, Elayne has used her Aes Sedai status mostly for Andors sake. The only place she might be accused of doing otherwise is Merrilor, where she agreed to no more than every other ruler has. Even there, it is FAR from clear she will bring Andors army to support Egwene; her specific comments on the subject indicate just the opposite.

To the limited extent I agree with you, it is that Egwene has too much influence with Elayne, but the Randland status quo requires all rulers consider the Amyrlins counsel even if they ultimately reject it, and Elayne has the unenviable, often conflicting, duties of both queen and Aes Sedai to harmonize as best she can. There is a reason no (known) Aes Sedai has ruled a country since the fall of Manetheren but, if Elayne could do worse for a model, Egwene is more likely to learn (the wrong lesson) from that disaster. Regardless, anyone (including you) who expected Elayne to repudiate (her fellow) Aes Sedai once crowned under- rather than overestimated her sense of duty and loyalty. As Aes Sedai AND queen, she lacks the luxury of treating those roles as mutually exclusive, even without an additional loyalty to her friend the Amyrlin, or the need all rulers share to maintain good relations with Tar Valon just as they must with all other great political powers.
But she is in the best position of any ruler since Hawkwing to be able to do without those good relations. She is a position of real or potential power such as has not existed since one of the most powerful ta'veren in history sat on a throne, with her alliances, military capabilities and proportion of the world under her control. It could be said that if Tarmon Gaidon were not on the horizon and occupying all other attention (and the White Tower were not presuming on her good will when considering the state of the nations), the Tower might need her help to keep its own influence more than she needs their support to keep her power.

Likely so, but that opportunity is unexploitable from an antagonistic position. I do not expect Elayne to be TOO exploitive, because she remains Aes Sedai and Egwenes friend, but she is savvy enough those facts will not blind her to the ramifications of the Tower and Andors positions and relationship. She could only miss them if she WERE blind; as you note, she has the BT on her doorstep and the Kin in her parlor.

Yet even were she willing to pull the trigger on the threat of a rival Tower, it is a single-shot weapon: Once used, they are no longer sometimes competitors and allies, but total and permanent adversaries. On the heels of a succession war and eve of TG, as she tries to integrate three entire kingdoms, that is not a fight she would want to pick even without additional personal loyalties, and not one in Andors interests anyway.

Elayne can afford non-engagement no more than appeasement, particularly with a power holding more influence than any other in all other Westlands nations. It was no accident Ishara cultivated Andors unique relationship with Tar Valon, any more than it was incidental to Andors subsequent progress and stature. No wise ruler casually provokes a powerful ally of millennia to the point antagonism replaces alliance, and Elayne would not do so even absent personal ties to the Tower.

I understand the situation with the influence and authority of the Tower all too well. My problem is that Elayne had the best chance to do something about that, and in the Merrilor invite, an urgent reason to do so, but passed it by.

Elaynes plans for Merrilor, like those of the other rulers, is unclear, probably by design. So long as their intent remains unknown, they have leverage with both Amyrlin and Dragon, which committing, especially openly, would greatly diminish (except for those willing to be known as untrustworthy, whose "support" is obviously worthless.) Andor might benefit from a few subtle barbs, but not from free agency, which would present them as a loose cannon the Tower could (and would) easily isolate from all other parties. Hawkwing largely succeeded in that because one of the strongest ta'veren and best generals in history, but Elayne is neither, and Randland can ill afford another Consolidation when the Seanchan have conquered half the Westlands and TG is clearly imminent.

And it's as much for the well-being of the Tower as anything else that I wish she and Nynaeve would buck the system more - unlike most other Aes Sedai with independent worldly power apart from their position in the Tower, Elayne has had the least training and indoctrination, and thus has the best chance to do what is right rather than what serves the benefit of a too-powerful multinational corporation. Make no mistake - Nynaeve's test all but explicitly demonstrates what has been suggested throughout the series: the Tower's primary focus is brainwashing devotion and obedience into their initiates, and flat-out murders those who retain too much independent thought! That was the crux of the debate following Nynaeve's test - they wanted to murder Nynaeve for demonstrating her adherence to morality over blind directives of the Tower, and were disgruntled that her out-of-school experience prevented them from succeeding.

Not that I think you truly wrong, but they clearly cannot see it. For Aes Sedai (all of whom passed final testing,) it is a question of paramount discipline, whose absence dooms those lost or st/killed. They can or will not see the extent they can make not only passing but surviving testing nigh impossible even with supreme discipline.

Note, however, it is only "nigh" impossible; Nynaeve succeeded despite people not only professionally but personally committed to her failure, just as Moiraine and Siuan did. Aes Sedai being Aes Sedai, virtually all receive final testing from one or more women personally antagonistic toward them and/or convinced of their unworthiness, yet Aes Sedai are still raised. A significant number overcoming great challenges, produced as much by personal animosity as by rigorous testing, is an argument for the Towers view discipline is critical.

What imperiled Nynaeve is what revealed the extent to which test administrators hold applicant lives in their hands: Her repeated success against their challenges infuriated her proctors beyond reason, until THEIR discipline broke and they employed lethal threats unsurvivable under the tests supposedly inviolable standards. Recall Elaidas chastisement for going too far during Moiraines testing. Nynaeves problem was having no voice of reason there to defend her, because the childhood friend she mentored was too uncharacteristically concerned with the appearance of impropriety.

Nynaeve is a special case in many ways, in this instance because still feeling her way with both Aes Sedai and Amyrlin. In ToM, Egwene made a point of impressing the need to see her as Amyrlin rather than Egwene now; she may regret that at Merrilor. Nynaeves inclination to see Egwene as the friend with whom she plotted to winnow Black Ajah from within the Towers hierarchy, rather than as that hierarchys leader, dampens her impulse to challenge the leader.

The same is true to a lesser extent for Egwenes former Novice roommate, but Elaynes rearing conditions her to recognize and react to the change more promptly than Nynaeve. She notes as much during the PoV referenced below; "a Queen's closest friend among her subjects knew she was the Queen as well as a friend, had to know." Initially, Egwenes rise to the stole largely left the three of them still working together toward shared goals (usually at odds with the rest of the Tower,) but recognition as Amyrlin in fact as well as name signals coming conflicts. Soon she will no longer stand athwart the Tower at their sides, but at its head in their faces.

Give it time. They are used to thinking supporting Egwene IS bucking the system; it will take a while for them to realize how much she has become a part of it. Ultimately, they should both see how a close relationship with the Amyrlin lets them buck the system far more effectively (e.g. the Tower angrily demanding the return of an angreal Siuan loaned Moiraine without their knowledge; was it ever actually returned, or did Lanfear end up with it?) First they must realize how becoming an officer ruined a good sergeant, which often requires things like Merrilor and Nynaeves testing.

Maybe with luck Egwene will even see there are people with whom she should cooperate, council (again, like Siuan and Moiraine,) rather then just trying to manipulate.

First and foremost, let us be clear what happened there, and why: Elayne sought to ensure the Borderlanders did not invade and/or pillage Andor; once convinced they were only passing through, her concern became facilitating the "passing" at the expense of the "through," with minimal loss of life and property. Practically and technically, Elayne could not prevent an invasion (and thus, technically, act of war,) that had already occurred long before anyone in Caemlyn knew of it: Her task was to prevent an OCCUPATION and de facto war, then hasten a withdrawal.
Agreed. I think I conceded as much. This was just a quarrel I had over a technicality, and so was getting out of the way early.

Well, alright; even the technicality was not Aes Sedai authority infringing on Andors sovereignty, but preventing the latter by exploiting the Borderlanders misplaced respect for the former, to avoid premature assumption of Andoran authority she yet lacked.

She very expediently seized with both hands any pretext for doing so (incidentally ignoring the quarter million Borderlanders possible intentions toward the Dragon Reborn they abandoned the Blight border to seek.)
It's not like they could be a real problem for him anyway.

Debatable; they deliberately brought thirteen Aes Sedai to force him to meet them as a man. They held the eventual meeting at Far Madding for the same reason. There is the True Power, but that is a tiger-by-the-tail of last resort. Their intent was to either obtain the prophecy-fulfilling answer or perform the prophecy-fulfilling execution; the Foretelling impelling them indicates they could have been a mortal problem for him if they so wished.

In other words, rather than an imperious Aes Sedai trampling Andors sovereignty for her own ends, she used her Aes Sedai status to PROTECT Andor, adroitly avoiding the potential pitfalls of usurping royal authority yet unbestowed. Preventing a war as brutal and unwinnable as it would have been unnecessary is a dubious form of "treason," and claiming otherwise the kind of transparently disingenuous political ploy one would expect from her rivals for the throne. Acting as she did neatly transformed the Borderlanders presence from a military to diplomatic mission (as it should and would have been from the start, had they not acted unilaterally,) restoring rather than undermining Andors territorial sovereignty. Defending Andor and its citizens was her sole goal throughout, and she accomplishing it so well strong evidence she was the best potential queen.
Agreed, but what I suppose I have issues is not that Elayne acted as she did, but the implication that any Aes Sedai could have done so.

Yet any Aes Sedai could (and would) have done the same, a status quo not of Elaynes making, so objections to it do not properly lie with her. Fortunately, it was she who exploited it in Andors interests, which were thus protected, but general objections to Aes Sedai having the necessary influence are complaints against, not Elayne, but Randland (or the Borderlanders; TVs respect grows with both distance from it and proximity to the Blight.)

Your rather ironic error here is in treating the spiritual city-state of Tar Valon as a "foreign power" rather than what it actually is: Along with the Whitecloaks, the closest thing Randland has to a church, which only INCIDENTALLY acquired temporal power to serve its spiritual and socio-political ends. More on that later....
Whoa, hold up! How is this ironic? What I find ironic is YOUR defense of a multinational corporation exerting influence on the governments of nations and the selection process of heads of state! This is campaign finance reform writ large.

Nice try, but the WT is not a profit based institution founded in a separate sovereign state, but a spiritual order with its own state, whose members chief loyalty is to it above and often in place of previous national allegiance. Arad Domans Council of Merchants consists of multinationals; Tar Valon is, once again, the closest thing Randland has to a church apart from the Whitecloaks. I mean, really, "the Flame of Tar Valon?" That implicitly (if figuratively) proclaims the Amyrlin the human embodiment of half the Creators One Power. It may not be "Christs Vicar on Earth," but is as close as anyone but the Dragon Reborn can get.

If you find my position ironic due to my Catholicism, you grievously misunderstand my religion and my beliefs. If I were merely an historian or history bluff sympathetic to the role played by the Church in the affairs of the world and history, then I could be expected to similarly endorse the Tower assuming a comparable role. However, my adherence to and advocacy of the Church is nothing of the kind, it is informed by my belief in and acceptance of its teachings on faith and moral. Specifically, I believe, in the words of the Nicene Creed, in ONE, holy, Catholic and Apostolic church. I believe in ONE baptism, and the communion of saints in the Mystical Body of Christ. My support for the Church's role in world affairs (to the degree that I do) is predicated on the absolute faith in its possession of those marks. When the White Tower gives the slightest indication of possessing any of those characteristics, I might reconsider, but until then, my view of the Tower is more closely analogous to the International Criminal Court or the United Nations or any similar pernicious infringement of national sovereignty.

Growing up, the family cars had St Christopher medals on the dashboard or visor, but they also had "Get US out of the United Nations" stickers on the bumper. Third generation Roman Catholic, but also second generation John Birch Society.

Excuse me saying so, but your qualified arguments for supporting the Roman Catholic Church sound similar to those I would expect from any intelligent knowledgeable Aes Sedai. Apart from the Whitecloaks (whose doctrine requires regarding the Dragon Reborns channeling as proof such foulness it demands summary execution,) they are the sole organization explicitly dedicated both to serving the Creator and opposing the DO, generally and at TG specifically. Another difference between TV and a multi-national: I know of no multinational that maintains and trains its largest department solely to fight alongside Christ at Armageddon (not that He needs the help, mind, but you surely take my point.)

The fount of all the Towers well intentioned horrors is the vital valid end of saving creation from the DO; during the 3000 years they prevented another Taint-spawned Breaking, through the Dragons Rebirth and through TG. That would not excuse their excesses even if all served those ends, as some (e.g. Manetheren, Hawkwing) manifestly did not. However, the Roman Catholic Church is a far better model than any multinational for a millennia old spiritual order with monastic training and catechism, wielding both temporal influence and divinely granted power in war against ultimate evil, culminating in the saviors prophecied return and Armageddon. That is before throwing in the city-state all nations recognize as their peer.

The Towers pursuit of its noblest goals has been far from perfect, of course. Carnal greed and envy have often compromised them, even done them grave irreparable harm on occasion. It has nonetheless usually adhered to its catechism and moral principles, and declared anathema on the several glaring exceptions (a phenomenon not unique to that fictional organization; my wifes interest in the Borgia TV series prompted some more reading I wish I had declined. )

Like I say, you are treating Elaynes duties as queen and Aes Sedai as mutually exclusive, and the White Tower as a wholly distinct "foreign power," rather than an international organization with members at senior levels of every government except Amadicia.
I don't get the "rather than" of that statement. I recognize no difference between those two concepts. St Thomas More, patron saint of politics, drew a distinction between the temporal and spiritual power of the Pope (and as the two keys on the Vatican flag attest, they ARE two distinct and separate things, even if the Church does legitimately possess both). It was Henry VIII who rejected that distinction. I think you can guess whose side I'd take in such a debate.

Yes. Richelieus position might be more instructive, however (no surprise which of them was canonized. ) Unlike officers of multinationals (but very like Aes Sedai advisors,) he and the priest you referenced were both senior advisors to heads of state on general state policy, not just religious matters.

"Rather than" is tied to "wholly distinct." The Queen of Andor and an Aes Sedai may be distinct, but Elayne Trakand is a single entity who must balance the disparate and sometimes conflicting obligations of both. She can no more put sisterhood aside upon the throne than JFK could stop being Catholic on entering the Oval Office. The best analysis is in her own PoV when returning to Andor, reflecting on Egwenes stern response to Elayne and Nynaeves Sea Folk bargain:
...when she sat on the Lion Throne, she would still be Aes Sedai, and subject to the laws and rules and customs of Aes Sedai. Not for Andor—she would not give her land to the White Tower—but for herself. So, unpleasant as it had been, she accepted her castigation calmly. — ACoS, closing pages of the chapter "Into Andor."

I suspect Egwene is in for a rude awakening; she expects Elayne to automatically take her friend the Amyrlins side, but will likely find Andors queen will not commit her people to coercing her lovers obedience, not even to her Amyrlin.

It is not as simple as Elayne deciding whether she will serve the White Tower OR Andor; as queen of the latter and initiate of the former it cannot be: She must serve BOTH, finding a way to reconcile those duties when they are disharmonious.
I disagree. Her duties to Andor supersede those to the Tower, as they will remain for the rest of her life, whether or not she holds the throne. Her duties to the Tower are both imposed by force thanks to an non-permanent characteristic (channeling) and her own choice, which was not legitimately hers to make, since she had those aforementioned superior obligations to Andor.

If Elayne ever loses her ability to channel, all the ties to the White Tower are severed, the Tower will turn it's back on her, and embassies to Andor will be complicated by no sister wanting to be in the same room with her. But she will still be a queen, with all the obligations to the good of Andor that is entailed by that title.

The Tower might (unofficially) turn its back on her, but she could not turn her back on it; she pledged herself to it as surely as to Andor. As for that not being her choice to make: Please; history is filled with heirs-apparent who even renounced thrones for monastic orders. Perhaps Elayne should have done the same on becoming Aes Sedai, but that would just have plunged Andor back into the succession war on the eve of the Last Battle, hardly in the nations interest.

That should ultimately prove advantageous for Andor because, if the White Tower has strings tied to it, it has those in every nation; the difference is that, unlike those others, Andor also has a string tied to the TOWER, in the form of a strong Aes Sedai queen close to many of its leaders.
What exactly ARE the rights of a sister from the White Tower that are mentioned at any point in the series? Aside from an exorbitant stipend Elayne probably doesn't need, merely the right to tell other sisters to fuck off and get their noses out of her business. All I want is for her to exercise that right. On the other hand, the rights of the Tower's leaders seem to extend as far as the sister will let them get away with. Again, hence my problem with Elayne. Look at Faile's litany of the experiences of other sisters who have held political positions or connections, and how they were all forced by the Tower to betray those outside interests. That is the practical experience of the rights of Aes Sedai when the Tower has a political agenda to enact. Even in these latter days, Moiraine's only recourse was to flee the reach and attention. The queen of two nations cannot rely on that tactic.

True enough, but Andor has little motive to reject its few resulting Tower obligations. The big one is Merrilor, which exists not because the queen is Aes Sedai, but because the Amyrlin insistently "requests" all heads of state be present, and none wishes to be absent from such a council. It is unwise to mark oneself as the Towers foe when the Amyrlin holds a council with world leaders that even includes the Whitecloaks Lord Captain Commander. That is a fine way to discover ones nation subjected to something like the Partitions of Poland: Divided among neighbors, the action internationally recognized as legal, almost unanimously (Wikipedia claims the Ottomans, of all people, never recognized its allies extinguishing Poland, retaining a Polish ambassador until their own dissolution.)

Again, Merrilor is as much opportunity as obligation, and could be powerfully so: If the Aes Sedai queen takes the lead in opposing the Amyrlins policy, that is plenty of cover for any and all other heads of state to follow suit. In that instance, the Tower does need Andor far more than Andor needs the Tower, because if Elayne does not support Egwenes position, neither will anyone else.

Certainly the onus is on Elayne to assert the limits of Tower authority and influence within Andor as appropriate, but I honestly cannot think of many occasions so far where it HAS been appropriate. Short of banishing all Aes Sedai (presumably including herself) I am unsure what you desire of her.

Meanwhile, this is not a case of Elayne abandoning Andor to run an errand for Egwene, taking the Andoran army with her: Virtually every head of state AND their army will be present at Merrilor.
That makes it worse, not better. By going along, she makes it harder for any other nation to refuse the next such command performance.

That would not happen regardless, as you know well. Going along changes nothing, but refusing to go along would isolate Andor (a BAD thing.)

Elayne would be conspicuous by her absence if not among them, damaging Andors standing with Tar Valon, to the benefit of the other nations. This is a case of the Amyrlin calling world leaders, accompanied by their armies, to a council with the Dragon Reborn (which I do not believe will go as well for her as she expects.)
Invading Poland did not go as well for Hitler as he expected. Did not make it right, or even a thing to be applauded.

Quite so, but this is about Elayne, not Egwene. Merrilor is likely to blow up in Egwenes face, as Elayne helps fan the flames, hardly a mark against the latter.

It may be that Andor might have suffered for her absence, but if the Tower turns on Andor, who does it have left? The Borderlands who are otherwise committed when it comes to foreign affairs? The nations controlled by Elayne's lover or his vassals? The Seanchan, ruled by the wife of one of Elayne's military allies?

Most likely the Borderlands, with whom it shares a common, strong and horrific enemy poised to deliver a mortal blow of which they will bear the brunt. However, if every nation BUT Andor were present, the Tower could pick and choose; your questions answer would then be "EVERYONE except the Seanchan."

Obviously, if Merrilor goes as Egwene hopes neither the nations Egwenes lover controls nor his vassals will be much problem, since the meetings whole point is turning them and everyone else to Egwenes side against him. At that stage, being his lover and leading the only absent army would be a MAJOR liability, and the pertinent question "Who are ANDORS potential allies? The nations that just betrayed Rand to escape his (and in Cairhiens case, her) yoke, or the Seanchan who would put a collar around her neck?" Fortunately, Merrilor will not go that way, but Elayne has no assurance of that (quite the opposite,) and Rand gives her strong reason to be present wholly apart from Andor or the Tower.

Seriously, it is unwise (and poor leadership) for heads of state to abstain from international councils, particularly on weighty topics (breaking the final Seals and initiating TG definitely count) whether or not they accept the final agreement. Historically, opposing the known world has a messy unpleasant endgame.

She can do that because she is more than just Tar Valons head of state (though she is obviously that, too.)
And it's a bad thing that she has this status, and Elayne is in the best position to destroy that status, but is pissing away her chance over a schoolgirl friendship.

There is a bit more to it; Elayne was a Tower initiate long before she met Egwene. That is an asset rather than liability for a queen. Unless we are to believe Egwene will betray Andor to the Shadow out of petty jealousy of Elayne (even though the last Amyrlin who did that was stilled for it) it seems a safe bet the Tower will leap to oppose all threats to the first (known) Aes Sedai-ruled kingdom in two thousand years.

Anyone negotiating agreements with Andor will have fun, too. The Gray Ajah can no longer offer an impartial third party, since Elayne knows many and shares an allegiance with all. Real advantages come with her serpent ring, wholly apart from its impression on rulers facing both queen AND Aes Sedai combined in negotiations. The truth the Queen of Andor speaks is not the truth one hears; trying to stick a dagger in her back gives her carte blanche to incinerate ones army.

Likewise, Elayne is more than just Andors head of state; the implications of that for Tar Valons obligations TO Andor may not have dawned on Egwene yet, but anyone born and raised in Elaynes station would realize them instinctively.
WHAT are those? As far as the traditional view of the Tower seems to go, and as far as Egwene acts, the flow of duty between sister and Tower is a one-way street! Why have the other sisters been so eager to have a sister on the throne of a country? Are they so eager to burden the Tower with an obligation to a single country? Is it REALLY possible that none of them have considered all the ramifications the whole organization has been chortling over since Elayne manifested her spark?

Possible, though extremely unlikely, but I think they underestimated the wilfulness common in Andor (and its monarchs,) generally feeling as you do: Obligations to Andor will be slight; those from it, great. However, any advantages exist only as long as Elaynes rule, giving them a strong vested interest in preserving it. That is probably the biggest obligation, and similar ones flow from it.

In general, an Aes Sedai on the throne means what is good for Andor is good for the Tower, giving the Tower incentive to make things as good as possible for Andor. Elaynes reign must be as peaceful and prosperous as possible to redeem the notoriously selfish scheming Aes Sedai in the eyes of the world. As already noted, Andor almost automatically has the edge in any international negotiations, because no truly impartial Gray Ajah arbitrators exist, which other nations know even if the Tower never actually DOES anything; advantage: Andor.

If negotiations break down and war commences, the Tower will not stand aside and watch the first Aes Sedai Queen in 2000 years fall, so guess whose armies will have a score of her closest friends on hand for Healing during and after each battle. Guess whose armies will have NONE. Theoretically, if Elayne decides to employ the classic Andoran "ride out in front of the army" gambit she could lay waste to the opposition with any angreal she currently has on loan from the Tower, which would be devastating given her strength in the Power.

At the spectrums opposite end, the Tower intervened in a trivial border dispute between Andor and a minor Murandian noble it hoped to make a king strong enough to end the countrys anarchy and banditry. What will it do for an existing Aes Sedai queen ruling the largest Westland kingdom? Many disputes will never need formal negotiation, let alone war. The robust sophisticated Tower diplomatic corps present nearly everywhere will consistently advocate Andors position in all disputes.

The Towers chief obligation to Andor under Elayne is to preserve her kingdom and forward its interests for their own sake, which provides Andor many benefits. It could be the first nation in 2000 years CERTAIN Aes Sedai acting on its behalf actually do so. Andor has few liabilities unless Tower conditioning convinces Elayne to roll over for its every whim. The Tower certainly anticipates that as much as you do, but I have seen little evidence for it, and expect none.

Regardless, Elaynes duties to Andor do not abrogate her duties to the Tower,
They do when they conflict.

Theoretically, conflict should be impossible, since defeating the DO and preserving the world are always in Andors interest. However, I am not convinced you have presented a practical conflict between Andoran interests and those the Tower disingenuously claims vital to its laudably valid nominal purposes.

any more than either of those do her obligations of friendship with Rand or Mat, or her defensive feelings toward the Sea Folk.
Actually, she tore down Rand's banners to make it explicit that her duties to Andor come first (while she knew that there was no conflict, due to his own lack of interest, she was prepared to contemplate fighting his people to preserve her right to the throne and maintain her de jure independence). Her personal distaste for Mat was sublimated to the military advantages brought on by a working relationship between the two of them.

What personal distaste for Mat? More like his personal distaste for her, which itself thawed remarkably in ToM; as early as ACoS he reflected that Elayne had become less antagonistic toward him, and was not sure he liked it (Elayne has his number, which makes Mat uncomfortable, because he likes to fly below the radar.) As you note, her public response to Rands banners was mostly just that: For public consumption, to establish she was not his puppet. She must establish the same public view of her relationship with Tar Valon, but the only reasonable pretext so far is Merrilor, and she NEEDS to be at Merrilor (for various reasons.)

Elayne must rule in a manner consistent with White Tower principles, as surely as JFK was obligated to execute his congressional and presidential duties in a manner consistent with Roman Catholic principles (far more so; since Elayne is a full sister and JFK was merely a layman, she is fully conversant with and aware of the orders teachings.)
Who says? Where on Earth do you get obedience to moral strictures laid down by Divine Authority for the conduct of one's life to the self-serving regulations of an organization? And just what ARE those principles Elayne must follow? The Tower has absolutely no moral guidelines ever expressed in the series, merely technical rules, like "no torturing initiates - torture is exclusively reserved for traumatizing petty felony suspects".

Calling prohibitions against torture "merely technical rules" rather than "moral guidelines" is somewhat semantic (at best; at worst it willfully denies the latter phrases unambiguous meaning.) Not lying is a significant moral guideline, too. So is not making weapons, or only using the Power as one in self defense (those expecting a renaissance of Power-wrought blades should realize how unlikely that is whether or not the technique becomes widely known again.) That the last one has an explicit exception for Shadowspawn ought to make their moral imperative fairly clear (hint: Not profit, though they are hardly averse to it. )

I don't care if Elayne lives up to the Three Oaths (well, I do, because they're bullshit, hypocritical and immoral, but that is for the person, not the queen), I care about her ruling Andor in a way that puts outside interests ahead of her nation, especially outside interests which have in almost every example shown in the series, proved inimical to the nations or individuals involved, and serving the expansion or security of Aes Sedai power first and foremost. I am talking about things like Siuan's interference with Morgase & Gareth Bryne defending their country and people from foreign criminals, in order to further a White Tower scheme to put a criminal on the throne of a neighboring, and traditionally hostile country.

The White Tower is not purely an outside interest, because its membership does not end at Tar Valons gates (else the debate would be moot.) Further, Tar Valons chief interests (defending the world from the DO and ensuring safe responsible use of the Power) are global interests that include Andor along with everyone. Again you treat all Tower interests as "inimical to the nations or individuals involved." The scariest words in Randland (or Cannoli-Randland) are "I'm from Tar Valon and I'm here to help." Except the Tower is not physically incapable of doing anything positive for any one else, and usually does not avoid it (rather the reverse.)

If you fear Elayne putting outside interests before Andors, provide an example of her doing so, or it is a biased unsubstantiated fear. So far, your best arguments concern her second Sea Folk bargain, but that serves Andor by forging a unique relationship with what actually IS Randlands foremost (by far) multinational.

Elayne's placing her duties to the Tower on a par with those to Andor is not like Kennedy governing by Catholic principles (as if that was ever an issue for him either! ), it is like Kennedy putting his duties to his Knights of Columbus chapter, or Bush placing his obligations to Skull and Bones (or his oil company employers) on a par with his duties as President. Siuan's interference in Andor's affairs is akin to say, Pope Benedict forcing Acting President Biden to call off the DEA's prosecution of a Mexican drug lord caught in the US, because the Pope had a plan to make that same guy President of Mexico one day!

I concede the last; Siuan was too clever for her own good, and paid dearly, mainly because she has no more international diplomatic background than Egwene does (yet is her principal tutor.) But the WT is no secret society nor multinational; it is the closest thing to Randlands church outside the Whitecloaks. In that respect, it would be hard to fault Elayne, even Queen Elayne, for siding with the last defence against the Shadow instead of Andor; she could not, since the Shadows victory would moot all Andors interests along with everyones. Only conflicts over means and intermediate ends are possible, in which Elayne has at least as much discretion and latitude as any Aes Sedai (it should be clear by now the Amyrlins authority stops at TVs docks, and is limited even THAT far with sisters: Ask Siuan.))

Fortunately, that relationship is not as inherently antagonistic as you suggest; most of the time it is fairly harmonious, since the White Tower is not competing with Andor for political, military and economic supremacy (i.e. not a "foreign power."
Yes, it is. The Tower wants everyone going their way, and fuck anyone who has the moral or natural right to do something differently, is their view.

I believe you may be projecting again.

The Tower has an agenda, and even if right at that moment, it is not in conflict with Andor's, it might, so anyone with responsibilities to Andor, has no business entertaining conflicting interests. It is as simple as that. That's the point of the whole concept of conflicts of interest!

I am familiar with the concept, but have never seen or heard it desribed that way. If that were its nature, EVERYONE with multiple interests (i.e. everyone) would always experience it, because any two interests might conceivably, at some point, some day, conflict. Conflict of interest is only possible when interests conflict; THAT is the concepts defining quality. The problem is presupposing the Towers interests always conflict with everyone elses; they clearly do not.

Sometimes, the Tower wants a particular puppet ruler on the throne in Murandy, and will intrude on Andor's own affairs to make that happen, regardless of who gets hurt. Even if the decision is in Andor's best interests in the long run, that's not Siuan's call to make, or the Hall's or anyone else's. That call is Morgase's, because she was chosen by Andor's equivalent of the electoral college to be the queen. The Great Houses did not choose Siuan and she would have been a remarkably poor choice by any standard, having no experience of the world beyond the slums of a fishing district, and the byzantine internal political schemes of an insular organization; certainly nothing that renders her fit to pass judgment on the best interests of the Andoran farmers being robbed and raped, or the people of Murandy who would have to live under the central rule of a thief, despite a thousand years of expressing a preference for more localized government.

Again we return to a debate larger than WoT: Murandy has, not "more localized government," but de facto anarachy. Its well-earned reputation motivated Siuan to seek a strong unifier for its throne; his banditry was no deterrent simply because Murandys king must be either criminal or FOREIGN. Good grief, who is the most prominent Murandian in the series? That speaks volumes of the countrys character; calling it "localized government" is like calling a Roman orgy "slightly indecent."

Returning to the matter at hand, if the Tower advances an interest in conflict with Andors, Elayne would have a conflict of interest; she does not automatically have one in all cases by sole virtue (or vice) of being both queen and Aes Sedai. In the particular case you cite, Siuans interests conflicted, which she badly indulged by acting for the Tower to overrule Bryne in "impartially" arbitrating a dispute between Andor and Murandy, instead of recusing herself. Had she no dog in the fight, there would have been no conflict of interest. Again, your errant assumptions are 1) the Tower always has a dog in the fight that 2) always opposes all others. Had Siuans role been as Murandys representative, the Towers interests and Murandys would have been in harmony and there would have been no conflict, thus no conflict of interest.

Also once again, your hatred for Egwene is coloring your opinion of Elaynes interaction with her.
No, my hatred of Egwene is informed by my distaste for tyranny and her preferred affiliation with practicing institutions.

Which is fine for your attitude toward Egwene, but your attitude toward Elayne should be independent of it. Unfortunately, though Elaynes dual roles as Queen of Andor and Aes Sedai have yet to present her with conflicting interests, they have managed to present you with one. Perhaps recusal is in order....

It is not a given Elayne will side with her friend and Aes Sedai superior against the Dragon Reborn and her childrens father.
But she will at first. There was a dream about that.

It is late, I am sleepy and have not re-read ToM in a week; care to refresh my memory? Elaynes comments indicate more inclination to Rands view than to Egwenes.

Everyone Egwene took for granted as on her side has been unexpectedly tepid on the matter, even among her closest Aes Sedai confidants. Personally, I think Jordan intended Merrilor to spectacularly explode in Egwenes face
Drang nach osten exploded spectacularly in Hitler's face, but that does not excuse Stalin for his initial support of that course, even though it was in his best interest at the time.

It was in Russias interest throughout: They fought half the inevitable war in other countries, and it precipitated a war between Germany and the Western democracies, ensuring that either 1) they would destroy each other, 2) the Allies would be badly bloodied eliminating the Nazi threat, 3) the reverse or 4) Russia would have strong allies in the inevitable war with Germany. The last scenario was the most likely and least appealing, but still more so than facing the Nazis alone, with all Poland in the enemys possession. When the dust settled, the Soviets had even "liberated" all of Eastern Europe both parties seized, plus a third of Germany.

Regardless, you will have to reacquiant me with an example of Elaynes initial support for Egwenes plan. Her initial reaction was "well, there are only three seals left, and they're crumbling." Not exactly a ringing endorsement.

(it almost must, since it is fairly clear Rand is correct and Egwene incorrect about the Seals) and begin her meteoric fall,
We can hope.

I am more curious than anything, because so much of diction almost demands it. You forced me to briefly dig out ToM again just now; in the final pages, after nearly getting herself and Gawyn killed supposedly granted Egwene an epiphany on par with Rands in TGS, she reflects on her WARDERS change:
Gawyn nodded. No further complaint or argument. It was a wonder how he'd changed. He was as intense as ever, yet less abrasive. Ever since that night with the assassins, he had started doing as she asked. Not as a servant. As a partner dedicated to seeing her will done.

See, they are equals now; one equal has just subordinated every aspect of his being to the total fulfillment of his "partners" every whim.

Reading stuff like that, I cannot help thinking they are setting up Egwene. How is someone wholly dedicated to anothers will a partner rather than servant? In what version of English does that definition fit the former word, not the latter? Jordan and Sanderson are either laying dramatic irony on thickly, or badly need a dictionary.

culminating with a new Post-TG Amyrlin in the person of Logain Ablar,
Two problems - 1. the implication of a unified male-female organization. Bad. Even with the men running it. The more discrete channeling institutions to check each other's power, the better. 2. Logain's an asshole. He's not much better than Egwene, except that his own self-serving ambition puts him fortuitously in opposition to a bad guy (much as Egwene's did back in LoC, except Taim is worse), and he's next on my list of people who are way too inclined to coddle and protect Aes Sedai and give them a pass for crap.

1) You assume Jordan was a Libertarian; I do not believe I have met many Libertarian Masons (although, secret society; WTF knows...?) You think the WT runs better than the Hall of Servants? It is a matter of record male and female channelers have both greater power and skill linked together than separately, and not just because the links can be six times larger (though that is certainly true also.) IF channeling survives the Third Age, the Aes Sedais original yin-yang symbol will return.

2) Yeah, that has always been Logains problem: He likes Aes Sedai too much. That is, he no longer wants to slowly torture each of them to death (which you may consider an unforgivable sin. ) He recognizes their nature, with all their flaws and limitations, in part, I think, because he knows great channeling strength makes one no less human nor more infallible. He does not let "the Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills" hide panicked ignorance behind apparently knowing mystery, because he knows better, and how Aes Sedai plot, scheme and ERR against each other like HS girls trying to seduce the starting QB: Just for higher stakes.

He is arrogant and proud, not necessarily ambitious; he learned surplus ambitions price the hard way. Otherwise he would confront Taim, either to supplant him or as preliminary to supplanting Rand (whom he has challenged on knowledge, but never authority.) He would not run all over Hells Half-Acre as the Dragons errand boy.

whom Min tells us is destined for great authority.

Ironically, I'm going to go with Egwene's dream, which seems to imply a false and hollow glory of which Logain seems all to aware, but accepts anyway. I am thinking it will be something like his being given credit for what Rand does, and the lie having to be upheld to maintain unity or support for Rand's agenda or plan.

That one is slipping my mind also, though I can certainly see those accomplishments credited to Logain in the next Age so Rand can have some anonymous peace. If you mean Logain stepping over a fallen body, accepting a leading role with resignation, that is one reason I suspect he will lead a re-unified Hall of Servants: Rand brings them together as LTT truly Reborn, then exits stage left as Logain assumes his place. If Rand survives the series it is unrealistic he would walk away from Andors queen and their kids, but perhaps he will pull a Maud'dib (it has certainly been foreshadowed; he has not even gone blind yet, despite flirting with it.)

If I had to bet, I would say she will be captured, turned (as foreshadowed in her Tower testing) and tearfully ripped to bloody shreds by one or more of her erstwhile friends, providing a highly emotional scene (and later references to it) that proves Jordan was not above killing major protagonists.
I would hate such a scene, as it would imply she is a character for whom we should have sympathy.

Many do, rightly or not. She is certainly a major character, and represented as one of the "good guys," but (contrary to what fans of the Protagonist with a Thousand Faces believe) expendable, not vital to the plot. If Moorcock can kill Elric at the end of that series, Jordan can certainly kill Egwene at the end of his.

Some of the counterarguments have been cited already, by characters in the books, no less, because ELAYNE DID NOT MAKE THAT AGREEMENT, RAND DID! Elayne merely recognized a good idea and stole it,
There is no indication that she was aware of it. She certainly never made any reference to any such precedent, which she would have when she recognized the disadvantages of surrendering Andoran territory.
I'm no happier about Rand, but he's pretty much the only character or institution in the series for which you can claim anything like the transcendent authority of the Catholic Church, which you tried to attribute to the White Tower above.

Rand is an individual, not an institution. To the extent LTT is a Christ-figure, however, the Aes Sedai are his bride. Elayne may have been ignorant of Rands deal though; the timing had me thinking his was in conjunction with the Bowl rather than just for naval transport.

like a good ruler should (and speaking of rulers, the thing about fealty is, it is FEALTY; if it consisted doing solely what one wished it would not be much of a bond. )
It would seem to be inherently non-transferable. Once Elayne surrenders her authority over those people, they have no further obligation to support her deal. Fealty is NOT supreme authority anyway, it is more a mutual security agreement, with one party making the decisions. It is NOT outright ownership, as the limitations of Rand and Egwene over their vassal sisters should demonstrate.

They can always walk away from their land to escape the new Sea Folk tyrants; Randlands serfs (to the extent they are even regarded as such) are not inextricably tied to the land like Medieval ones. To the extent it is Elaynes land, however, as part of the realm she rules or simply as part of her personal estates, she has every right to do with it as she pleases. Residents opposed have as much right to leave, but none to alter her decision.

Elaynes "donation" to the Sea Folk puts Andor in a unique, almost monopolistic, situation similar to what Cairhien had with the Aiel until Lamans Sin. The Topless Towers of Cairhien were built with profits from that exclusive trade relationship; one can only guess what wonders Andor will construct with its profits from Sea Folk ceramics, rugs and spices, not to mention trade goods from Shara only available through the Sea Folk and Aiel (who trade with the Wetlands far less since the Aiel War.)
The benefit of the Aiel deal was in its exclusivity. Elayne has no guarantee of exclusivity with the Sea Folk, who will have similar deals with Bandar Eben, Illian, Tear & Cairhien. So where are they really going to bring their goods? One of the great port cities in the world, or the shitty little colony so far from the salt on the Andoran riverbank? According to you, Elayne was aware of and stealing the idea for Rand's deal, so then she had to know there was no real exclusive advantage going into it.

One exclusivity guarantee is ability to negotiate Windfinder independence from the WT (another thing she can do, and largely already has, solely because Aes Sedai.) However, she has much better ones: Recall Rands agreement only applies where his authority does; at present, that is Tear and Illian plus (arguably) the cities of Bandar Eban and Maradon. Arad Doman, however, recently regained its king, Saldaea never lost its queen, and Min as much as told Rand Darlin will be king of Tear. By the end of TG the Sea Folk will have a deal with Illian—alone—if and only if Rand does not relinquish that crown to ride off into the sunset (or die, in which case primogeniture would probably join Illian to Elaynes ever growing realm, making Tear VERY uncomfortable.)

In all other lands and cases, the Sea Folks only long term bargain is with Elayne. They have no deal with Cairhien, but have one with Cairhien-Andor-Ghaeldan. That includes point-source (or nearly so) access to Bearlons iron ore, Two Rivers tabac and trade goods generally unique to Andor, easily the largest wealthiest Westlands nation now (unless we count the Seanchan conquests, but I do not believe the Sea Folk trade with them much. ) All Borderlands goods must pass through either wartorn Arad Doman and Seanchan held Tarabon, or Elaynes realm. The Sea Folk have access to Tear and Illian (for now...) plus everything between Andor does not simply absorb; everything else must come through Elayne. Most of their ships will consequently go to her realm.

That is easily the biggest advantage, but Elayne has also gained a lever and link to the Sea Folk she can use on Andors behalf (particularly given her history with their Wavemistress and her Windfinder.)
I would still like to know what leverage she has, exactly? She can't control what they do on their square mile, so she can't stop them from using it as a trading post of their own or a transhipment point. Unlike Rand's deal which did not specify water access, hers did, so other traders can land river boats on the bank or docks of the enclave, deal direct with the Sea Folk, and totally cut Andor out of the equation. The enclave is on the river, by the very wording of the deal, and thus Elayne cannot stop the Sea Folk from coming and going to and fro, like Rand plans to. His own description of the deal says that because they don't have to give the Sea Folk water-adjacent enclaves "they can't be too arrogant," which by extension means that if they DO have water access, they CAN be arrogant. And they can be arrogant because they have the control and are subject to no other pressure. Rand's ports force the choice of following their rules to reach the enclave, or not using it. Elayne has no such option.

Other craft can dock if they can wedge their way between every Sea Folk vessel already docked at one of the Sea Folks foremost trading ports, yes, but I would not expect that scale to be great. Most trade will be overland, through parts of Andor abutting the Sea Folks square mile, to which all taxes and tariffs apply. The Sea Folk can IMPORT anything they like by water, supplying the port itself, but nothing may enter or exit by land without seeing Andoran customs agents.

Best case, each ship bearing duty-free trade one way must be accompanied by another bearing it the other. Even that is impractical, because each will be further reduced by ships carrying the ports duty-free supplies, or else Andor will cheerfully sell them food, clothing, wood and various other essentials with an appalling tariff for things produced at a distance of one mile. Massive tariffs would still make them cheaper than if hauled across an ocean, particularly at the cost of precious space rare spices, silk, porcelain, etc. could occupy in the hold. Elayne did not casually cede a square mile of Andor for no more than half a years use of a dozen WFs. Even without tariffs, the boost to Andors economy along with the Sea Folks, and consequently fostered diplomatic relations, would remain.

The deal only appears bad if we presuppose that, then diligently seeks its detriments while resolutely ignoring all benefits. Unless Shara has VERY productive slaves, it is not "Andors NAFTA."

That status will only be enhanced by her already stated intention to protect them from the White Towers intrusion by deflecting Egwenes interest in "acquiring" Windfinders. With Sea Folk embassies in Andor, the Kin setting up shop there and the Black Towers presence, it is not hard to see how that will develop: Assuming channeling survives the Third Age, Andor could quickly assume all Tar Valons status without sacrificing any of its own (particularly if Tarmon Gaidon leaves the White Tower a burning ruin and its current Amyrlin deposed/dead.)
My whole issue is with a monolithic power bloc controlling the channeling. The coincidence of its location and personality of the people in charge are immaterial. I don't care how nice the tyrant is, my issue is with tyranny.

Federalism is not tyranny; tyranny is tyranny.

And I don't see how contact with the Sea Folk specifically allows her to give them an end run around the Tower's acquisitive tendencies. Especially as she seems to be giving far too many indications of falling into line with the Tower, and you seem to be arguing that she has an obligation to go along with their principles, one of which is "we get any and all female channelers we want, and no one else does unless we feel like it."

The Tower regulates the Hell out of channeling due to the War of the Power, Breaking and sparkers burning themselves out and/or killing themselves and/or others. They went too far trying to completely control channeling, but the Windfinders, Wise Ones, Seanchan, Sharans, even, to some extent, the Kin, demonstrate that control is incomplete. Elayne (and Nynaeves) orginal deal already grants WFs the right to come and go as they like at TV, with AS tutors at their beck and call almost as an exchange program. Those are huge benefits Rand cannot provide that again improve Sea Folk relations with Andor, through its queen, but cost the nation nothing. Aes Sedai humbled at their seat of power to the benefit of and at no cost to both Andor and the Sea Folk; you should be thrilled.

And give the devil her due. Egwene's replacement deal with the Sea Folk, on which she brought in the Wise Ones, allows her to circumvent the bargain Nynaeve and Elayne made, which gives the Sea Folk all the protection they need, while forcing nothing onerous on the Tower (unless you subscribe to their position that everything the Tower wants is theirs by right, and letting people keep what they have had without causing a problem for 3000 years IS too much to ask of the Aes Sedai). Egwene now has the ability to tempt young and impressionable women who have not put down roots and might be inclined to wanderlust, with positions of power instead of service, and ease and luxury instead of discipline and the rigors of a water-extreme environment, and the Wise Ones and Windfinders got suckered into it. Elayne can't do crap about it anymore.

Nor can anyone; their backing out of Elaynes first deal does not make it a bad one for Andor. Her second deal (granting a square mile of Andor in exchange for temporary use of Windfinders) did not involve the Tower at all, only Andor, and remains valid.

Egwene was being Egwene, stating refusal to be either fool or tyrant then attempting to be both. She prated of cooperation behind wide smiles, as she met her mentors fear of steel bonds with fervent denials and plans for lace ones. She began with assurancess she would not supersede the earlier agreement then did just that (which the Three Oaths apparently allowed.) The Towers disgust with the first deal shows Elayne does not routinely sell out Andor (or anyone) for the Tower, but letting the DO fry the world would have served only his ends, and WAS what Elaynes initial deal concerned, even if later amendments included other things. It was hardly Elayne dancing on Tower strings, and if the Amyrlin squirmed loose with a better deal, Elayne has as much responsibility for that as she had control of it (i.e. none.)

Elayne could even plausibly argue that if the Sea Folks (fourth) deal (so far) with the Tower supersedes their first two with her, it does so wholly rather than partly. She will not, because hers significantly benefit Andor (bargains need not entail loss by either side; ideally, both should gain,) but she has a basis for doing so. However, it could also be argued her second bargain explicitly amended that she made for the Towers. Note: That would not (necessarily) be a conflict of interest, because the first deal did not involve Andors interests (except indirectly in ending the drought) and the second did not involve the Towers.

Also note the Tower gains nothing from Egwenes deal it is not also giving up: It gets two apprentices each from the WOs and WFs, in exchange for two Accepted TO each. In that sense, it could be called a competition between three groups who each think their own ways best, and whichever (if any) is correct will lead by example. Worrying the Tower will seduce all impressionable unfettered WF apprentices is like worrying the WFs will seduce all impressionable young WO apprentices who like swimming: Three millennia of cultural conditioning will not be undone in a year or two of apprenticeship, but much will be learned. After a year and a half in Norway, I assure you I still prefer football to soccer, but my Norwegian is much better (if still not great.)

Those are better arguments, but for the most part we are talking about giving lands held by traitors in one kingdom to reformed traitors (or at least disloyal nobles) in another. Particularly in Cairhien (where, as you so helpfully note, nobles "commonly" abuse commoners already and plunged the nation into bloody civil war, with the traitorous nobles the worst of the lot) very little will change for the average daily plow-pusher. In many cases, they are not "losing" their "beloved" local lord/lady to Elayne, because said noble has an appointment with the headsman if anyone ever finds them anyway.
But they are losing a noble family with long-established ties. Sylvaese demonstrates how a bad noble can be succeeded by a better from the same House, as does Elayne herself. And the customs and practices of the families are familiar to the common people, and at least they have their common national frame of reference. That frame of reference generally trumps tyranny, as tyrants through the ages have known, and acted.

Sylvaese is probably not the best example, since many people thought she was Lanfear until Sanderson denied it outright, and the smart money is still on her being a Darkfriend (like seemingly all her retainers) or under heavy Compulsion. It is a relevant consideration though, simply because the distinctive "customs and practices" of the nobles in question are primarily disloyalty or active treason. If those are your standards for nobles, Elayne will hopefully never "measure up."

Otherwise, a Medieval-Renaissance noble is pretty much the same from Tear to Saldaea, though they seem to get a little more "French nobility is a contradiction in terms" as we go west. Most Cairhienin likely care little which noble abuses them 364 days of the year and molests them on the Feast of Lights.

The big change will be for the nobles, who will find themselves strangers in a strange land, without the power base they relied on to contest the throne in their native one, and forced by circumstances to support Elayne, at least until they establish a new powerbase (which will not happen quickly since most know no means of ingratiating themselves with peasants except naked unreliable bribery.)
That is a good point too. She does have a chance to keep an eye on them and keep them off balance, I suppose. Also, the more sensible will have to adapt to their new supporters' expectations, in the way we see the servants and their expectations influencing Elayne's day-to-day lifestyle.

That is it. As an added bonus, the local peasants who have no sense of loyalty toward their new foreign lord still retain all the same loyalty to their monarch, making them unlikely traitors but ideal informants ON traitors. In both realms, but most effecitively in Cairhien, the nobles most likely to stir dissent against the new monarch as an interloping child upsetting "the old ways" have been replaced with others just as much interlopers themselves. It is a time honored trick; shake the barrel and most apples either stick to the sides or fall to the bottom, and hopefully the rotten ones are tossed.

Ultimately, there are two critical differences between Elaynes authority in Cairhien and Rands: Elaynes is permanent authority by right of heredity, while Rands was the temporary authority of a peace-keeping occupation/defense. Consequently, even if Rand HAD installed new lords in Cairhien, he was not sticking around to ensure they responsibly met obligations to subjects or lose their newly gained lands (i.e. he was not assuming the monarchy.) Elayne is doing PRECISELY that (much of her objective is clearly to neutralize the nobles power to challenge her in their native lands,) and thus retains the power to rescind what she granted if the recipients do not demonstrate the merit to retain their new positions.
See, I think we have philosophical differences on government coming into play here. I know, shocker, right? By assuming the monarchy, Elayne become part of the social compact, and bound by the laws and systems. As an outside conqueror, Rand is bound only by might makes right, and thus has the right to order the administration of his new territory however he chooses, even if he does choose to throw them some bones by retaining much of the old power structure.

Legally, most nobles in question are traitors or competitors for the throne (often both.) Many were surely relieved to find themselves simply owning different estates in different countries rather than meeting an appointment with the headsman. The legitimacy of Elaynes act relies heavily on the nobles involved agreeing, but much of THAT is their knowledge it is far better than they deserve. There is little legal basis to challenge altered grants of nobility whose recipients are mostly traitors eagerly accepting the decision as by far the most desirable. Who is the plaintiff in that case, the commoners whose lords abandoned them?

Of course, as a practical matter, a ruler can get away with more by binding herself to an institution or set of rules, so while they might resist changes from Rand against whom they have no recourse, they will allow Elayne to get away with the same, despite the negative aspects, because they believe they have more checks on her. That is the same reason why the Tower has the Three Oaths, after all. I was making a point of principle, however, not pragmatic agreements, the latter of which I conceded these acts to be acceptable examples thereof. As I said originally, my concern is her ongoing disregard for important principles, which is a really bad habit to be getting into so early in her reign.

There I must fall back on the same argument, however tired: The traditional principle in dealing with traitors is eradication for state and public security, usually applied through a show trial and summary execution. It is hardly tyranny Elayne opted to instead transfer the guilty nobles to the estates of similarly inclined nobles in a different country. If the penalty for treason is four summer villas with vineyards, orchards and thoroughbred horses, its consequences have been badly maligned.

In the final analysis, once again, Elayne IS queen of both lands, in a much more absolutist than truly feudal way; her authority to award estates is beyond question. The question is whether the locals will be better or worse off for it, but the latter is almost impossible in most cases. Meanwhile, the nation (once Elayne formally takes the Cairhienin throne there will only truly be one, though possibly as something like Autria-Hungarys Dual Monarchy)
A nation is a particular group of people with common practices, ideas, etc. The Aiel clans were always a single nation even if they had no common state. The Two Rivers are a nation within the Andoran state, as the Amayar were among the Sea Folk. The Tinkers are nation without a state. Even if Elayne formally merges the governing apparatus and military and all the rest into a single institution and combines the crowns of both countries, it will not make the Cairhienin Andorans or vice versa. She might forge them into a single state, but making them into a single nation will take some more time, maybe even longer than even her lifetime.

True, but somewhat semantic; call it two nations within a single state, if you like. The two are not so different on the borders; animosity there is more due to age-old border conflicts than fundamental or insurmountable differences. Elsewhere, it is more like NY vs. CA than Japan vs. Brazil. But OK, sure, Dual-Monarchy, once again; Elayne is that monarch in both cases, and if she chooses to transfer estates between two of the nations she rules, she is within her rights, particularly since, in most cases, she would be within her rights to do with them as Rand did with Colavere.

and its queen gain the advantage of minimizing or eliminating myriad threats to stability, while speeding the newly united kingdoms integration. It is a win-win, as much for the nation and its subjects as for its monarch; the only losers are the treacherous nobles, but it is hard to argue anyone (ESPECIALLY those owing them fealty) has much sympathy for them.
I don't see the consolidation of power in an absolutist monarch as a good thing at all, no matter how admirable the character of this particular monarch. If nothing else, the idea that Rand's children will be as responsible and dutiful as their parents, or loyal to their parents' principles, should have been thoroughly debunked by ToM.

That is because you want to live in Murandy. It is, however, a question of taste and policy rather than legality or morality.

She implies nothing; the Queen of Andor explicitly rules the Two Rivers, as assuredly as she does as the Four Kings or Caemlyn itself. Several generations of queens managed to forget that, to the point their Two Rivers subjects have as well, but it is no less an indisputable matter of fact and law for that.
Bullshit. Statutory neglect. Their right to independence was morally affirmed by their defense of their homes (and incidentally Andor) from the Trollocs and Andor's own neglect of its obligations. Governments are instituted among men to secure the rights of life & liberty, against which the Trollocs sought to infringe. When any government becomes destructive of those ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to choose whatever ruler or leadership that they think will be most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Claiming sovereignty over lands they neglect to defend, and opposing, even if only verbally, the right of the people to defend themselves, and to select leadership to fill the void left by Andor, IS destructive of the ends of securing their rights to life and liberty and effecting the safety and happiness of the Two Rivers.

Oh ho; look who suddenly likes social contracts (who are you and what have you done with Cannoli, commie?! ) I am not sure Randland is quite ready for Hobbes and Locke; Perrin would hardly be the first monarch to carve a new kingdom from an existing one when no one was looking. Much of Randland is still no mans land because there is no one around to be governed, let alone govern.

From statute, however, the Two Rivers is indisputably Andoran, and Elayne correct that raising Manetherens flag is technically insurrection. Min was certainly quick to inform the yokels Morgase was their queen, and any of their other Baerlon neighbors (who pay regular taxes to the crown) would surely have done the same. Maybe Elayne can give Perrin and Faile estates in Cairhien and replace them with some noble from Ghaeldan. Anyone with a big enough army simply declaring themselves lord anywhere sufficiently remote where the people accept them, even within an existing state... like I said: Not quite ready for Hobbes and Locke. Thus Elaynes royal authority over the Two Rivers is unassailable.

Realistically, Perrin only (barely) repulsed the Trolloc "invasion" (with significant AS AND WC help) because he faced a few thousand foes specifically seeking his head (i.e. the threats sole basis was their "protectors" very existence.) Possessing nothing more valuable than wool and tabacc, and only a few thousand residents, they never attracted acquisitive eyes. If they did, either the Queens Guard would defend them or Perrin and his ragged retinue of bowmen would be ground under the bloody hooves of vastly greater and better organized professional soldiers with far superior equipment.

The Two Rivers' industrious refugees and greater global prominence require more defence than a single lord limited to local resources. Had Elayne just let them go, they would probably end up a Saldaean province. I suspect that was Failes plan, and that Elayne knows it, making her far more magnanimous than I would be.

All Elayne did was formalize the de facto status quo of their local autonomy by virtue of someone she knows to be a strong, decent and loyal noble, with the added political advantage of his wife being third in line to the Saldaean throne (though if her father and Tenobia manage to get themselves killed that might get a bit sticky, since it is unclear who would be heir-apparent if Faile abdicated.) The issue of her sovereignty over the Two Rivers is favorably resolved, without infringing on their autonomy; the showdown between her and Perrin we all anticipated for half the series died with more of a whimper than a bang (ironically, Perrins showdown with her brother was more dramatic, though still anti-climactic, but that is Perrin in a nut shell: Excruciating prolonged suspense and drama culminating in a severely underwhelming conclusion. ) Elayne relinquished far more than she was obliged to (since she had no obligation to relinquish anything,)
She relinquished nothing she had a right to, and far less than Rand did when he offered to give her the throne her mother failed to keep and hold, in the city he had to recover from the Shadow. Elayne had the moral obligation to not stand in the way of people doing what they have every right to do, and she long forfeited any right of authority over the Two Rivers. Inheriting the benefits the prior queens of Andor kept and held by maintaining the power of Andor, also means inheriting the consequences of their neglect of their duties. Andor failed the Two Rivers, Andor has no claim on the Two Rivers. Otherwise, Elayne had better get down on her knees to Fortuona, the rightful heir of Artur Hawkwing, and make humble apologies for her ancestor's rebellion and transgressions against her line.

Andor did not declare its independence on the basis of surviving a single attack thanks to substantial outside aid from two antagonist groups (one of which was only there to slaughter their beloved lord in the first place.) Not to mention that the Empress claiming the Westlands by right of descent from Luthair and Hawkwing is about as plausible as Aragorn claiming Gondor on the basis of descent from Isildur and Elendil: Luthair/Isildur was never their monarch, so while the claim may be nominally valid with the extinction of that monarchs line, the claimant better be able to back it practically by force of arms (which the Seanchan are doing quite well, actually.) Elayne could assuredly do the same with the Queens Guard, but it would be harmful to both sides at a time neither can afford it.

The bottom line is, by law, Elayne remains the Two Rivers' rightful monarch until/unless she relinquishes it. Even conquest would only gain de facto rather than de jure authority, but Perrin could never hold it against Gawyn or Birgitte leading the Andoran army. This was not a case of Elayne talking them into staying, but of talking them out of forcing her to put their heads on pikes and march on what are still very much her subjects, whether or not anyone has long been aware of the fact.

and it is hard to see why conceding a great deal of power that was hers by right, while retaining little more than nominal authority, is "abuse of power." If the US gave Guam a seat in Congress, would that be "abuse" also?
It is the same principle under which she claims Rand had no right to give her the throne of Andor, when he was the one exercising the moral duties of a ruler in Andor. The power over the Two Rivers was not hers by right. She and Andor forfeited all those rights years before, and only retained de jure authority because it was uncontested. Once the Two Rivers made up their minds about the matter, their decision was the only one that counted.

Again you argue from social contracts, which Randland grants only rudimentary, often only nominal, recognition, if any. It is exactly the opposite of her insistence Rand could not "give" her mothers throne, completely consistent with it: He could not give the rightful heir a throne not legally his to give any more than Perrin can deny the rightful monarch part of a realm legally hers. By force, sure, but not by law, because neither Perrin nor Rand had legal standing as anything more than commoners. Rand could at least claim to be settling the succession dispute, since Elaynes succession was not automatic, but in Perrins case it is cut and dried: Unless he initiaties and wins a true revolt against Elayne, she is the Two Rivers' (and his) lawful sovereign.

Perrin does not even have the right of conquest, because he did not conquer anything; he DEFENDED part of Andor from one attack by a comparatively small band of Trollocs and Myrddraal. Had he faced what is currently attacking just the city of Caemlyn they would not have found enough to bury, so this is not a case of the Two Rivers establishing their self-sufficiency and local security by force of arms. It is also not a case of defending his rule from the Aes Sedai his lawful sovereign (and her army,) a confrontation where I am not sure even being ta'veren would bring him victory. If Perrin has the sense it takes to be an effective noble, he will recognize that and welcome the greater military resources the rest of Andor, under its queen, provide at need. Note: I said, "if...."

Oh, Darlin is not so bad; he behaves far better than anyone expected prior to his little tete-a-tete with Rand in ACoS.

Yeah, he behaves the way he thinks will impress an audience. When dealing with people he doesn't think are important, we get "You will honored to die by my blade, peasant" and outrage when the man who's life he threatens talks back. When he's trying to impress the woman he wants to marry, he's all friendly egalitarianism, and giving Rand and Min the horses (hey what about the two poor bastards he made walk back to camp in a foreign wilderness - they had unattractive faces, so I guess they count less then the kids whose cousin he wants to bang - lovely leadership there), and boasting to Rand about sending food out to the poor during a siege. Of course it never occurred to him that the rebels whose bone of contention was aristocratic privilege and superiority over the common scum, might not let the food reach the common scum, but hey! He figured out after only three or so attempts what should have been obvious beforehand!

The sad thing is, even with her nascent tyranny, Elayne seems to be a definite step up on the rest of the bozos Rand seems content to let run the world in the near future.

One plays the cards dealt, but this is why commoner reaction to replacing some treacherous abusive nobles with other treacherous abusive nobles worries me little: Unless you are the lead dog, the view never changes. Though, to be fair, in the ACoS encounter, Rand was the one so imperious it made Min and Caraline wince at his challenge to Darlins position, which Darlin took in stride. His entourage were the ones outraged (i.e. the other nobles you lament WALKING a few miles for the first time in their lives while Rand and Min commandeered their mounts, instead of riding Rand down for his impertinence as they wanted.)

Elayne is doing magnificently well though, and I cannot understand why people are so critical of her (not to say Jordan did not spend too much time on her baths and warddrobe, but that is not a failing in her as a character; most pregnant nobles likely indulge themselves periodically with what most of us would consider long baths.)
Egwene has taken just as many baths as Elayne over the course of the series. In one, we see her relaxing in her bath as the climax of a sort of montage of vignettes of the real brains of her faction all running around dropping hints and nudging people into following her agenda. By contrast, Elayne's bath scene had her returning home from a business trip, get hit with work from the moment she walks in the door, be forced to conduct policy during her walk to her room, with a long full day of more work ahead of her, a bunch of uninformed idiots restricting any enjoyment out of her diet (and she's the one character most portrayed as a gourmand in the series), and the one pleasure or bit of relaxation she has to look forward is this bath. Which is conducted every bit as much for an audience as any other public appearance, with her still receiving briefings and updates in the bath, and being interrupted by an ambassador demanding an important territorial negotiation on a moment's notice. The whole point of the bath scene was to illustrate just how much privacy, freedom and leisure she had sacrificed to her duty, when one book before, one of her closest friends had characterized her occupation as "lolling around" and "playing politics." RJ seemed all too aware of the perception of the mechanics of ruling and privileges of being a ruler, and made an effort to demonstrate how for someone as responsible as Elayne it is an enormous burden, hardly repaid by the nice clothes she gets to wear. And of course, almost no one seems to have caught the point, preferring to complain about having to watch the spoiled princess take a bath.

Preaching to the choir, but then, I have no objection to watching leggy blondes bathe....

Egwene... Egwene is Machiavellianly awful, but I suspect her days are numbered. However, just because you despise Elaynes friend is no reason to do a 180° on Elayne, who remains my second favorite character after Mat. She has just the right blend of pragmatist and romantic (unrealistically so in royalty, and one needs a far better opinion than I have of the White Tower to think they removed her pampering)
On the contrary, her quick cup of coffee in the Tower would have hardly been sufficient for that. More likely, she was only pampered to the extent of the quality of food, fabrics and furniture to which she was exposed. She is certainly better at domestic labor than most of her commoner friends who can't cook or sew as well as she, and I have a hard time believing a girl raised by Morgase, Gareth Bryne, Elaida and Lini had any sort of an easy childhood. We see her recollections jibe with Moiraine's assessment of Morgase as using Elayne to compensate for her own shortcomings. Morgase failed to reach the shawl, so Elayne is going to the Tower if Morgase needs to sic the army on her own people who are less than enthused about another generation being indoctrinated to abandon national defense for the international schemes of a Tairen fishwife. Likewise, she came to the throne untrained and unprepared, so mother-daughter relations probably meant endless drilling on the art of ruling. We know that Elaida's method of helpful teaching is to drive her favored and prized students hard enough to force Aes Sedai brainwashers - the kind of women who put you up for a month of punishment for disagreeing about historical causality - to step in and go "hey now, lighten up." Gareth Bryne (who, fortunately for Elayne and Andor, seems to have made more of an impression in imparting his style of leadership than the women) might have been the closest thing to a father she knew, but her quick relationship with Thom strongly indicates she has felt a lack in that department, and his behavior since breaking up with her mother suggests his own affections for her were solely due to banging her mom. Of course, there was always Lini, and who better to relate to a kid than someone old enough to have raised her grandmother? Egwene or Nynaeve show more signs of childhood pampering than Elayne.

Maybe not Nynaeve so much; we do not know much about her family except that she had none beyond age fourteen, thereafter apprenticed to a Wisdom whose duties she assumed a couple years later. Not much coddling there. Now, the daughter of the towns mayor and only innkeeper/clockowner....

Commoners and Novices/Accepted who dislike her accuse Elayne of being spoiled often enough, and it fits the simple monolithic view of "fairy tale princess" well enough the image stuck with many readers, but it is not really accurate. Her life was sheltered in some ways, because Morgase did not want the Daughter-Heir killed (but ironically sparked a succession war anyway thanks to Compulsion) yet Elayne has demonstrated both will and skill for getting her hands dirty.

which is on full display in her reign to this point.
A good character in a ruler is not necessarily proof against tyranny and excessive expansion of power. While there are few characters I would rather see holding power in WoT than Elayne, respecting the limitations is the most important part of holding power. I felt that this was a concept she paid excellent lip service to on the way up, and on which she has fallen far short since gaining the throne.

On the other hand, that before and after also encompasses two different writers. I can't help but wonder if RJ would have written it in a way as to make clear that she was not all about simply gaining power, and to maybe split the differences to provide acceptable rationales for her heretofore atypical handling of authority. B-Sand has already shown marked deficiencies in comprehending some subtleties, so it is entirely possible that he saw nothing wrong with what she was doing, and did not feel a need to justify it.

She has also had to do a fair amount of improvising, but I still think she has done it quite well, both ethically and practically. I do not see her expanding or abusing power, only employing it in legitimate ways and, in the Two Rivers, reasserting it after long dormancy. Power is not inherently bad; it is vital and often quite positive, depending on its use. All power is abusable, but the possibility remains inadequate cause to abolish all power—particularly on Armageddons eve.

Return to message