the discussion the previous year barely had 20 posts in it.
This one has reached over 50. Nuff said. Bite me.
This one has reached over 50. Nuff said. Bite me.
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1416 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 863 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 772 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 919 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 962 Views
See?
10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM
- 745 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 932 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 855 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 699 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 770 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 669 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 808 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 650 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 667 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 783 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 661 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 762 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 701 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 709 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 813 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 653 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 671 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 701 Views
Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 774 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 745 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 713 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 617 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 749 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 640 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 769 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 930 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 712 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 646 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 657 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 634 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 778 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 668 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 835 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 659 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 640 Views