Active Users:731 Time:22/04/2026 01:08:32 AM
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM
I just find that the custodians of RJ's legacy don't approach it with the required respect for the detail that he spent so much painstaking effort on.

I share Sidous's unease with the casual disregard he displays to something like channeler strength, the identificaiton of individual angreal etc.

If he isn't even sure which angreal is being used by a central character, then there is no chance that he knows the exact multiplication ability of ANY specific angreal in the books.

RJ was able to say that Elayne's woman wrapped in hair angreal almost doubled her strength, whereas the turtle angreal would allow Aviendha to channel twice as much as Nynaeve, for example.

I quote this example from memory, as I haven't read the books for some time and I may be off with some of the specific angreal strengths.

But the point is, in order to do that, RJ would have known how much stronger Nynaeve is than Aviendha - in absolute terms - and also by how much each angreal multiplied a users strength.

Sanderson doesn't seem to have a clue about either of these issues. Heck, he didn't even seem to be aware that some of the key channelers might still not be at their full potential.

Where RJ would have known how far both Aviendha and Nynaeve were from their respective full potentials at the time when the angreal comparison to Nynaeve's strength was made in Crown of Swords, and factored this into his description of the amount of saidar that Aviendha could draw through the angreal, these subtleties apparently would go totally over Sandersons' head.

Very, very disappointing, is all that I can say.
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3199 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1554 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 646 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1435 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1289 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 1186 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1333 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1716 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 704 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1355 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 761 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 692 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 709 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1371 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1421 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1228 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1634 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1424 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1310 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1277 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1472 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1404 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1259 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 1142 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1279 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1368 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1255 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1300 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1313 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1239 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 1193 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1311 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1249 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1635 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 1145 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1383 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1200 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1251 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1206 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 1131 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 1133 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 1163 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 1088 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1223 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 1147 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1220 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 1041 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 1090 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1451 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1285 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 1106 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 1198 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1417 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 1053 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1283 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1275 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1262 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1291 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1285 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 1150 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 1151 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 666 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 1156 Views

Reply to Message