Active Users:388 Time:06/07/2025 01:20:13 AM
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... Shannow Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM
I just find that the custodians of RJ's legacy don't approach it with the required respect for the detail that he spent so much painstaking effort on.

I share Sidous's unease with the casual disregard he displays to something like channeler strength, the identificaiton of individual angreal etc.

If he isn't even sure which angreal is being used by a central character, then there is no chance that he knows the exact multiplication ability of ANY specific angreal in the books.

RJ was able to say that Elayne's woman wrapped in hair angreal almost doubled her strength, whereas the turtle angreal would allow Aviendha to channel twice as much as Nynaeve, for example.

I quote this example from memory, as I haven't read the books for some time and I may be off with some of the specific angreal strengths.

But the point is, in order to do that, RJ would have known how much stronger Nynaeve is than Aviendha - in absolute terms - and also by how much each angreal multiplied a users strength.

Sanderson doesn't seem to have a clue about either of these issues. Heck, he didn't even seem to be aware that some of the key channelers might still not be at their full potential.

Where RJ would have known how far both Aviendha and Nynaeve were from their respective full potentials at the time when the angreal comparison to Nynaeve's strength was made in Crown of Swords, and factored this into his description of the amount of saidar that Aviendha could draw through the angreal, these subtleties apparently would go totally over Sandersons' head.

Very, very disappointing, is all that I can say.
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 3005 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1354 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 541 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1228 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1075 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 993 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1140 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1512 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 612 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1164 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 656 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 556 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 631 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1141 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1204 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1046 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1410 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1158 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1107 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1065 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1222 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1157 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1045 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 953 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1084 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1147 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1057 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1092 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1096 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 1010 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 985 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1083 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1055 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1438 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 950 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1106 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1024 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 1011 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 1004 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 945 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 951 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 927 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 856 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1027 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 922 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1033 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 858 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 898 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1217 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1092 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 873 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 980 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1207 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 856 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 1027 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1055 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 1001 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1064 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1069 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 965 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 969 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 572 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 904 Views

Reply to Message