"Luckers: How much time does aMoL cover?
Brandon: It depends on which part of the world you are in. You will understand that when you read A Memory of Light."
I thought this bit was interesting. The way he responds seems to indicate more than just time discrepancies between POVs. Wonder what it means?
Brandon: It depends on which part of the world you are in. You will understand that when you read A Memory of Light."
I thought this bit was interesting. The way he responds seems to indicate more than just time discrepancies between POVs. Wonder what it means?
Most likely it's the only obvious answer: not all the storylines cover exactly the same timeline, and for instance he might have to go back in time in Logain's storyline, in the BT storyline, in Lan's storyline, in Loial's storyline etc. We already know this, he spoke of perhaps including some of what happened to Pevara and co. and he said he might include stuff about Danielle/Teslyn's plans for the BT, etc. If he doesn't go back in time some, then he will have to cover all of Loial's backstory with dialogue or POV reflections. Same for Lan - we'd likely catch up with him in the middle of battle if Brandon doesn't go back and cover some of what happened to him between his last scene and the start of the invasion from Tarwyn Gap.
This means in the main storyline (the one starting with the Fields of Merrilor where all the main cast was converging at the end of ToM) the timeline covered from there to the end of the book will be of X months (or more, or less), but in some minor storylines it will be longer, overlapping varying bits of the ToM timelines.
He basically dodged the question, he didn't want to answer how many months/days/years the last book cover, so he rather said it varied depending which area of the world the characters were in. But this was essentially a RAFO.
Of course this immediately sparked many time travel or TAR theories (people forget in TAR it's only perception of time that's different because time passing is how each dreamer perceives it's passing, this has no bearing on "real" time), but Brandon would not have answered that way if that was he had in mind.
Very interesting QA with Brandon
20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM
- 2890 Views
I found it painful to read
21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM
- 1111 Views
Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
22/04/2012 04:26:27 AM
- 952 Views
Re: Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
22/04/2012 08:06:38 AM
- 1021 Views
Re: Agreed ... He got some softball questions here and couldn't answer them ... But there is a lot
22/04/2012 02:39:41 PM
- 956 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon
22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM
- 1032 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon
22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM
- 1095 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM
- 1279 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM
- 1044 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here
24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM
- 1042 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM
- 969 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM
- 1038 Views
It's got little to do with obsession...
25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM
- 959 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession...
25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM
- 974 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession...
27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM
- 900 Views
Question about TGS and ToM:
27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM
- 879 Views
Very similar to you
27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM
- 983 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books?
29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM
- 941 Views
of course there's no plan
30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM
- 1304 Views
Egwene...
27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM
- 910 Views
Re: Egwene...
27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM
- 899 Views
Re: Egwene...
28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM
- 881 Views
I don't find it all that surprising
28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM
- 821 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising
29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM
- 839 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising
30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM
- 753 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens
30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM
- 912 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens
30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM
- 799 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone
01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM
- 796 Views
Re: Egwene...
30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM
- 754 Views
Re: Egwene...
01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM
- 869 Views
Re: Egwene...
01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM
- 1080 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
01/05/2012 12:08:33 AM
- 998 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear...
24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM
- 960 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined
24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM
- 982 Views
Elminster vs Karsus, Darth Vader vs Darth Revan, Demandred vs Sammael - who has more midichloriants.
25/04/2012 03:13:17 PM
- 1248 Views