Active Users:1200 Time:23/02/2025 08:48:31 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
And then every time I've asked you to do so, you've redefined the remnant of a remnant instead. When I try to explain that you're redefining the remnant of a remnant instead of the Aiel, you insist that you're redefining the Aiel.

In fact I said the opposite. There are people like the Tuatha'an that are inclusive of the original Aiel population and those who ran away from Hold and Clan that have moved around to a variety of places. These people are not included in Aviendha's vision and could very well be who the remnant is in reference. You cannot make a blanket statement that Aviendha's vision is untrue because the remnant doesn't survive when we have no way of knowing what happened to a portion of the Aiel population.


I didn't say the REMNANT didn't survive, I've said that THE REST OF THE AIEL DO.

Take ten apples. These are the Aiel.

Take one out of those ten apples. This is the remnant of a remnant, who will be saved and who will live.

Nine apples remain. These are the Aiel who are unsaved and who will not live.

In Aviendha's vision, those nine apples show up fine, in complete defiance of the prophecy.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan DoraSedai - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1941 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future LadyLorraine - 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM 1226 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. Fanatic-Templar - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 960 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel darius_sedai - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 916 Views
There are more than there were before. Fanatic-Templar - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 928 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers darius_sedai - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 845 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. Fanatic-Templar - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 918 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. DomA - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1066 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* darius_sedai - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 448 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. Fanatic-Templar - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 966 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. DomA - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1162 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either darius_sedai - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 905 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either DomA - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 887 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. Fanatic-Templar - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 833 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. DomA - 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM 981 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. DoraSedai - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 873 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. DoraSedai - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1115 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. Fanatic-Templar - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 828 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. darius_sedai - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 786 Views
So what you're saying... Fanatic-Templar - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 732 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel darius_sedai - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 825 Views
I never said it was. Fanatic-Templar - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 900 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been darius_sedai - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 839 Views
No... Fanatic-Templar - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 943 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc darius_sedai - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 917 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc Fanatic-Templar - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 943 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc rosco12 - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 734 Views
Thanks for that. Fanatic-Templar - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 662 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could darius_sedai - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 877 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. Fanatic-Templar - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 724 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel darius_sedai - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 867 Views
No. They are not. Fanatic-Templar - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 765 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel darius_sedai - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 783 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. Fanatic-Templar - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 951 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel darius_sedai - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 731 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. Fanatic-Templar - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 753 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant darius_sedai - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 819 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant Fanatic-Templar - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 801 Views
That is what I just said darius_sedai - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 767 Views
What is important about that? Fanatic-Templar - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 739 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand darius_sedai - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 912 Views
So what you're saying is... Fanatic-Templar - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 790 Views
That's exactly it darius_sedai - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 860 Views
Good. Fanatic-Templar - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 883 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it darius_sedai - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 746 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. Fanatic-Templar - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 850 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing darius_sedai - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 743 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing DomA - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 934 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy darius_sedai - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 696 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... Fanatic-Templar - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 734 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? darius_sedai - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 735 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. Fanatic-Templar - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 864 Views
Don't know when this became about winning darius_sedai - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 650 Views
Re: I never said it was. DoraSedai - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 918 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. DomA - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 964 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. DoraSedai - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 842 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* JasonD - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 425 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes