Active Users:730 Time:13/12/2025 06:15:30 PM
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc rosco12 Send a noteboard - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM

Again, you have not provided evidence that being an Aiel is defined by following the Way of the Leaf. But let us accept that for the sake of getting to a point. Then you do accept that the Prophecy of Rhuidean states that He Who Comes With The Dawn will destroy "those who follow the Way of the Leaf" except for a remnant of a remnant whom he shall save?

How do you think Rand will destroy those who follow the Way of the Leaf? Rand has not been seen to be involved with followers of the Way of the Leaf at all, that has mostly fallen in Perrin's area.


While I'll rather not get involve in your conversation. I thought I should mention that you(Fanatic Templar) are quoting the prophecy wrongly. The prophecy is:
"He shall spill out the blood of those who call themselves Aiel as water on sand, and he shall break them as dried twigs, yet the remnant of a remnant shall he save, and they shall live."

So obviously those who follow the way of the leaf are not part of that prophecy.
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2105 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1124 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1078 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1079 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1007 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1093 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1327 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 523 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1153 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1393 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1063 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1060 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 991 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1027 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1312 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1010 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 940 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 883 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 990 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1083 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1020 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1116 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1107 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1115 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 893 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 807 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1021 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 898 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1050 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 925 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 930 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1115 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 890 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 906 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 959 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 976 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 930 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 907 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1068 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 966 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1026 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1049 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 892 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 990 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 936 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1132 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 863 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 906 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 860 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1017 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 807 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1107 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1128 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1025 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 501 Views

Reply to Message