Active Users:528 Time:07/01/2026 02:50:44 PM
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan DoraSedai Send a noteboard - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
Aviendha - her second trip thru the columns - is this just a good possibility or can she do something to change that future? Can Rand and Mat change that future? Mat being married to Fortuone (Tuon), they should have children, hopefully, and should teach that child the proper ways of dealing with Aes Sedai and Asha'men. Tuon, being what she is, should remove all collars and let the damane go to the White tower or back to the Wise Ones or the Sea Folk. I see a different use for the a'dam. That should be used to capture and control the remaining black ajah first off, but later, used only for teaching. But doesn't Tuon need to go back to Seanchan and reclaim her homeland? Are they going to try to conquer Shara also?

If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2128 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1143 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1105 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1104 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1027 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1118 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1353 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 531 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1172 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1432 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1080 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1074 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1011 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1050 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1336 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1033 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 957 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 901 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1007 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1108 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1044 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1135 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1130 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1137 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 918 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 831 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1038 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 920 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1071 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 945 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 954 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1136 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 904 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 924 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 980 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 996 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 950 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 926 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1085 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 988 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1045 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1073 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 917 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1009 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 962 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1155 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 883 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 923 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 877 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1038 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 831 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1122 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1148 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1041 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 507 Views

Reply to Message