Aviendha - her second trip thru the columns - is this just a good possibility or can she do something to change that future? Can Rand and Mat change that future? Mat being married to Fortuone (Tuon), they should have children, hopefully, and should teach that child the proper ways of dealing with Aes Sedai and Asha'men. Tuon, being what she is, should remove all collars and let the damane go to the White tower or back to the Wise Ones or the Sea Folk. I see a different use for the a'dam. That should be used to capture and control the remaining black ajah first off, but later, used only for teaching. But doesn't Tuon need to go back to Seanchan and reclaim her homeland? Are they going to try to conquer Shara also?
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
If the columns are true and no possibility to change that future, then the Aiel are doomed to become the true Aiel again. The Dragon will be reborn to destroy the Seanchan and send them back across the ocean, and bind the Aiel back to him for rescuing them from the evil Seanchan invaders.
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
- 1895 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
- 1163 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
- 907 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
- 860 Views
There are more than there were before.
04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
- 879 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
- 785 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
- 862 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
- 992 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
- 904 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
- 1099 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
- 780 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
- 892 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
- 1066 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
- 769 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
- 733 Views
So what you're saying...
07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
- 679 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
- 790 Views
I never said it was.
08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
- 845 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
- 781 Views
No...
08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
- 899 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
- 863 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
- 888 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
- 681 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
- 826 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
- 670 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
- 809 Views
No. They are not.
10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
- 708 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
- 715 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
- 893 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
- 673 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
- 684 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
- 764 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
- 745 Views
That is what I just said
14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
- 715 Views
What is important about that?
14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
- 692 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
- 859 Views
So what you're saying is...
14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
- 730 Views
That's exactly it
14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
- 809 Views
Good.
15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
- 828 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
- 696 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
- 795 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
- 695 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
- 865 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
- 680 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
- 679 Views