Active Users:527 Time:18/09/2025 02:07:26 PM
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM
The plates deforing is what is called a "bad thing". The armor works by preventing the concentrated impact of the weapon from reaching the soft body underneath. This is accomplished by several means, none of which include denting the armor. The short (and incomplete) description is that it takes the impact from the weapon, and spreads the force across the surface area of the plate. If the plate deforms, the force is no longer spread. I can go into the physics of it, or you can just believe me.</quote

a) I'm enjoying this argument, but try not to be so condescending.

b) While a larger area to spread the pressure over means less force, a denting armor is similar to the "crumple zone" on cars, which is what I think Lorraine is getting at. The denting armor means that the contact lasts longer, so by deltap = Ft, there is less force imparted by the same swing.
At last, I have an apostrophe!

*MySmiley*
Foil fencers Dance the Spears. Or, at least, the foils.

Too stubborn to remove that extraneous *MySmiley*

~The Decapitator~
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1561 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1023 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 540 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 948 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1041 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 499 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 930 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1106 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 897 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 536 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 899 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1040 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 460 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1161 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 959 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 929 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 933 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 960 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1007 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 857 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 930 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 836 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 954 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 795 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 823 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 928 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 801 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 791 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 607 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 908 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 862 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 852 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 978 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 803 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 816 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 930 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 915 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 881 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 766 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 899 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 789 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 930 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1079 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 802 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 786 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 956 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 820 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 830 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 987 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 818 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 811 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 853 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 513 Views

Reply to Message