Active Users:1729 Time:23/12/2025 10:24:36 PM
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
I'm not exactly thinking hard about these things. They all seem pretty logical and simple to me. Pulling the earth out from under a group of soldiers already sounds like a fantastic idea to me.


Earth is one of the powers that is weakest in females, and nobody, in 13 books, has ever done it. That is what I mean by creating new tactics. Even easier is to open a gateway to 1,000 feet straight up over the command post of your enemies and turn them into artillery for your side. However, nobody in Randland is doing anything like that.

Like I said, C armored troops would be much more effective, and more resistant to the OP battlefield tactics that have been used to date than the current forces.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1647 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1111 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 579 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1033 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1110 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 535 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1009 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1178 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 971 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 575 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 985 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1142 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 492 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1238 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1031 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1006 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1011 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1023 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1104 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 953 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1014 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 919 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1051 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 889 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 901 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1002 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 892 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 864 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 637 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 982 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 948 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 934 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1046 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 914 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 875 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 919 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 999 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 982 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 938 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 853 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 997 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 873 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1042 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1206 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 888 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 859 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1041 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 903 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 899 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1052 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 908 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 876 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 994 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 557 Views

Reply to Message