The why did anyone ever wear it?  By your logic, wouldn't everyone just go into battle naked and thus have the greatest amount of mobility?
Fine functional (iron) plate armor restricts mobility less than you think. And when you can construct it form 1/16th or 1/32nd thich plates instead it gets even better. When we change the discussion to a scale mail variant then the discussion of mobility becomes even less relevant. A C scale jerkin would probably weigh less, and restrict less than a leather one, and warders have been shown to wear that regularly.
No matter how you slice it (no pun intended) C, as a material for armor, makes excellent sense.
As for your suggestion for plated city walls or gates, there would indeed be benefits, though far less often. Absent rams and trebuchets, city walls and gates are resiliant even when made of stone and regular iron because there is no real need to be concerned about weight and mobility.
It is those 2 concerns that makeS C be so effective. Use of armor has always been a trade off between better protection, and the weight a being or vehicle can handle with the mobility limitation that weight causes.
Iron is approximately 480 pounds per cubic foot. 40 pounds of iron is about 144 cubic inches. 144c ubic inches flatened to about 1/16th inch creates a sheet of iron about 3' by 10'; yes that is right feet, not inches. If you can actually manage to roll the sheet to 1/32nd you doubble the size of that final sheet. Even when you factor in that C is heavier than a like mass of iron (we don't know how heavier, just that it is mentioned several times as fact). a full suit of C plate armor would still only be about 20 to 40 pounds (depending on how thin your technology/skill allows you to roll the iron).
When you consider that the swords warders swing around weigh the better part of 10 pounds, the weight of armor (because it is distributed around the body) would hardly be noticed.
	Fine functional (iron) plate armor restricts mobility less than you think. And when you can construct it form 1/16th or 1/32nd thich plates instead it gets even better. When we change the discussion to a scale mail variant then the discussion of mobility becomes even less relevant. A C scale jerkin would probably weigh less, and restrict less than a leather one, and warders have been shown to wear that regularly.
No matter how you slice it (no pun intended) C, as a material for armor, makes excellent sense.
As for your suggestion for plated city walls or gates, there would indeed be benefits, though far less often. Absent rams and trebuchets, city walls and gates are resiliant even when made of stone and regular iron because there is no real need to be concerned about weight and mobility.
It is those 2 concerns that makeS C be so effective. Use of armor has always been a trade off between better protection, and the weight a being or vehicle can handle with the mobility limitation that weight causes.
Iron is approximately 480 pounds per cubic foot. 40 pounds of iron is about 144 cubic inches. 144c ubic inches flatened to about 1/16th inch creates a sheet of iron about 3' by 10'; yes that is right feet, not inches. If you can actually manage to roll the sheet to 1/32nd you doubble the size of that final sheet. Even when you factor in that C is heavier than a like mass of iron (we don't know how heavier, just that it is mentioned several times as fact). a full suit of C plate armor would still only be about 20 to 40 pounds (depending on how thin your technology/skill allows you to roll the iron).
When you consider that the swords warders swing around weigh the better part of 10 pounds, the weight of armor (because it is distributed around the body) would hardly be noticed.
			Functional Cuendillar Armor:  Possible or impossible?
	    
	         - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
	        1607 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
	    
	         - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
	        1061 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			I suppose I am on a...
	    
	         - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
	        994 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
	    
	         - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
	        1102 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
	    
	         - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
	        1143 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			My thought was always about weapons.
	    
	         - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
	        1210 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
	    
	         - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
	        1053 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Ummm, Warders...
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
	        900 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
	        971 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It can not be directly effected by the OP
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
	        889 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
	        1004 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
	        839 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			which way is it?
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
	        868 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
	        963 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			That's really not my point.
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
	        842 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			I never said that they could not be stopped
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
	        952 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
	        907 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Not nesecarrily
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
	        896 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
	        1013 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			..and you are creating new tactics
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
	        845 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
	        841 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive  - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
	        883 Views
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
	        883 Views
	        
	    
	
	     - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
	        883 Views
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
	        883 Views
	        
	    
			Not accurate
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
	        961 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			You are thinking too far inside the box
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
	        948 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I disagree
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
	        911 Views
	        
	
		
		
	
	    		
			If armor is of no benefit...
		
	         - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
	        815 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
	        939 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			nope
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
	        826 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			*Shrug*
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
	        984 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: *Shrug*
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
	        1144 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
	    
	         - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
	        917 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
	    
	         - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
	        856 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
	        841 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Maybe, maybe not
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
	        823 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Maybe, maybe not
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
	        1002 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
	    
	         - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
	        863 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
	    
	         - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
	        1022 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
	        855 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
	    
	         - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
	        848 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
 