Active Users:2295 Time:11/01/2025 02:28:08 PM
I disagree darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
Even a very large goblet is still going to be smaller than a breastplate or such for armor ... No matter how thin. And we have no clue how much cuendillar would weigh. Even if it is incredibly light it will still hinder mobility compared to leather etc as it does not have flexibility. No matter how you look at it armor reduces mobility, and that can be fatal in a melee ... As others have pointed out there are still gaps in even the best armor and realistically no armor will protect against channelers. Maybe a nice ceremonial suit of armor for the King or the Amyrlins Warder would be cool, no matter how you spin it the advantages just aren't really there.

If you want "out of the box" and you are going to use cuendillar as a defense I would think it would be smarter to coat a cities walls with it or something along those lines ... Having literally unbreakable walls or gates would be far more beneficial than a few suits of armor that may or may not give a handful of warriors an advantage against a Trolloc.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1425 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 879 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 469 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 785 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 882 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 428 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 780 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 972 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 772 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 471 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 756 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 879 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 399 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 944 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 817 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 780 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 779 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 823 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 869 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 711 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 781 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 680 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 818 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 662 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 676 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 793 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 670 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 662 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 545 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 774 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 716 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 722 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 827 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 664 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 683 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 784 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 756 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 722 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 630 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 761 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 652 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 782 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 940 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 669 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 646 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 792 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 680 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 676 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 848 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 670 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 653 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 720 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 434 Views

Reply to Message