Active Users:2863 Time:22/01/2025 05:31:41 PM
My point is HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM
That increased survivability is increased survivability. Your argument, taken to the extreme would result in everyone in a battle to just say "whatever" and stab themselves because nothing could protect them from every potential death so they might as well just get it over with.

Sorry, most people's attitudes don't work that way, and I suspect neither do yours. In a conflict situation I am going to take every resonable advantage I can lay my hands on "..to make the other dumb son of a bitch die for his." as Patton supposedly said. C armor is just one more (relatively) simple way to help make that happen.

I hope some sort of C armor makes an appearance in the final story even if it is just Egwene changing Gawyn's shield on the eve of battle with the customary "Oh, I should have thought of this earlier." that we have seen other times.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1438 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 894 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 474 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 797 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 899 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 434 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 795 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 986 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 786 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 477 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 768 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 893 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 405 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 957 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 831 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 793 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 792 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 834 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 885 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 724 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 797 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 693 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 829 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 671 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 690 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 805 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 683 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 678 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 551 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 787 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 729 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 735 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 841 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 676 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 698 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 798 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 771 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 740 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 643 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 766 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 666 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 790 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 953 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 678 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 661 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 807 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 692 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 694 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 862 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 680 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 669 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 734 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 440 Views

Reply to Message