Active Users:801 Time:23/12/2024 07:27:39 AM
My point is HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM
That increased survivability is increased survivability. Your argument, taken to the extreme would result in everyone in a battle to just say "whatever" and stab themselves because nothing could protect them from every potential death so they might as well just get it over with.

Sorry, most people's attitudes don't work that way, and I suspect neither do yours. In a conflict situation I am going to take every resonable advantage I can lay my hands on "..to make the other dumb son of a bitch die for his." as Patton supposedly said. C armor is just one more (relatively) simple way to help make that happen.

I hope some sort of C armor makes an appearance in the final story even if it is just Egwene changing Gawyn's shield on the eve of battle with the customary "Oh, I should have thought of this earlier." that we have seen other times.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1416 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 863 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 465 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 772 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 870 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 422 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 770 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 962 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 759 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 466 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 745 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 866 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 396 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 933 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 806 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 773 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 768 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 814 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 855 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 699 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 770 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 669 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 808 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 650 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 667 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 783 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 661 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 652 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 542 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 762 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 701 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 709 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 813 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 653 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 671 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 774 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 745 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 713 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 617 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 749 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 640 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 769 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 930 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 657 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 634 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 778 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 668 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 666 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 835 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 660 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 640 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 709 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 427 Views

Reply to Message