I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
The only reason why would it be difficult is if the author chose it to be. In theory, it's a piece of cake that would only be dramatically effective (against channelers) the first couple battles before the thinkers of an army figured it out.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
- 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
1642 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
1105 Views
I suppose I am on a...
- 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
1028 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
1137 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
- 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
1173 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
- 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
1230 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
- 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
1098 Views
Ummm, Warders...
- 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
945 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
- 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
1007 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
916 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1043 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
- 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
880 Views
which way is it?
- 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
893 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
- 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
995 Views
That's really not my point.
- 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
882 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
- 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
978 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
- 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
941 Views
Not nesecarrily
- 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
925 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
- 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
1041 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
- 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
900 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
- 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
868 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
911 Views
- 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
911 Views
Not accurate
- 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
991 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
- 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
976 Views
I disagree
- 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
931 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
- 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
845 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
- 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
989 Views
nope
- 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
861 Views
*Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
1028 Views
Re: *Shrug*
- 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
1196 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
956 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
- 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
892 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
- 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
881 Views
Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
853 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
- 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
1034 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
- 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
892 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
- 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
1047 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
- 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
902 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
- 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
871 Views
