Active Users:3067 Time:22/01/2025 05:34:28 PM
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM
Force = Mass * Velocity

Pressure (another name for force) is rated in pounds per square inch.

In other words to cause damage you need to apply a maximum of force across a minimum of area. This is why a knife point pierces you but a tabletop does not even if you impact that tabletop with substantially more force. Plate armor takes the concentrated force of a sword edge and (if the armor material does not fail) spreads that across the dimension of the entire plate. That force then passes through the plate to the underlayment (thick padding that absorbs impact and sweat, lots of sweat) before impacting the body. IF a sword edge composed of 1 square inch delivers 100 pounds of force, and it impacts a breastplate that is 1 square foot, then the force that is transferred from the plate is only a little over half a pound (no it is not that clean there is substantial force loss that I am ignoring). This is what happens when the armor works and does not deform.

If the armor deforms under the blow then instead of the force of that blow being spread across the entire under surface area, it is transferred using only the surface area of the deformation, minus the amount of force that was consumed to create the deformation. This event is known in scientific nomenclature as ouch, or in the vulgar as "oh crap, that hurt, you said this stuff would protect me, I think I am dying"

The dissipation of the initial impact depends on the strength of the material the armor is made from, and the angles involved with the application of the force. In iron/steel plate armor, a certain flexibility of the metal is needed, but only to keep it from shattering. In most materials hard=brittle, C does not have this problem, it simply does not break or deform regardless of the amount of force.

Because of this property, you can actually do some really fancy things with force redirection by actually covering the outside of the plates (you could actually go without the plate) with layers of thin wires in geometric formations that would actually take the force of the incoming strike and dissipate it (actually send the force off at an angle as a shear) before it could contact the base plate and be transferred to the underlayment and ultimately the wearer of the armor.
``_/\_
_/\__/\_ as a crude example

Randland folks would probably lack the trig/geometry/calculus to actually design such a lattice, not to mention the manufacturing capability to extrude the hair thin wires and precisely fasten them, but it is a neat intellectual exercise. Theoretically, you could actually make a breastplate that could take the incoming force of an attack, and channel it completely around the protected body (think of how the pavement breaks under Iron Man when Hulk pounds on him instead of Tony Stark turning to jello).

The net result of hitting it with a sword would be like hitting a steel wall, more painful for the attacker then the "victim" because the force of the strike would be reabsorbed by the weapon that made it.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1438 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 894 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 474 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 797 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 899 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 435 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 796 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 986 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 786 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 477 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 768 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 893 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 405 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 957 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 831 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 793 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 792 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 834 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 885 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 724 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 797 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 693 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 829 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 671 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 690 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 805 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 683 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 678 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 552 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 787 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 729 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 735 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 842 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 676 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 698 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 798 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 771 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 740 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 643 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 766 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 666 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 790 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 953 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 678 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 661 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 807 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 693 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 694 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 862 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 680 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 669 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 735 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 440 Views

Reply to Message