Active Users:1114 Time:14/11/2024 10:48:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
Good job. You've demonstrated that you are 20x smarter than your average Aes Sedai.

Of course they can be killed easily using indirect affects of the OP. The indirect affects of the OP are common knowledge even to Mat. The heart of the advancement of warfare is bettering the betterer.

Who would have the advantage between 2 warders with exact same skill/power/speed if one were wearing heartstone armor and the other was wearing the finest non-heartstone armor available and they were both using weapons of choice?
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1401 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 851 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 453 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 754 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 853 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 415 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 749 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 901 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 946 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 740 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 454 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 725 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 847 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 385 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 918 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 790 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 756 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 754 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 798 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 838 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 683 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 750 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 653 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 791 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 638 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 650 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 766 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 642 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 636 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 531 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 743 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 678 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 692 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 796 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 637 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 654 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 683 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 748 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 732 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 696 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 599 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 733 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 621 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 747 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 912 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 693 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 632 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 641 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 614 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 756 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 652 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 648 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 814 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 641 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 625 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 690 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 421 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes