some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
1) Circle of Channelers: Pick up late mass of earth/stone. Drop on warrior/s.
Result: at least entombing the warriors for a length of time, potentially suffocating or crushing them. Probably will snap necks on impact if large/solid enough mass.
2) Channelers: create massive fire around warrior (Either with OP or by lighting the area on fire)
Result: suffocation of warrior as oxygen is consumed and, potentially, smoke fumes are produced
3) Channeler: Suck the air out of an area, creating a vacuum
Result: suffocation (do you sense a theme here? )
Just like any armor, there will be weak and/or unprotected points that could also be exploited by simple arrows, not to mention mind-guided arrows, swords and daggers of air. And, as a more insidious method, to one use spirit to sap the life from a warrior be flowing draining weaves between the armor joints? There woudl have to be room for movement, thus room for air and thus, feasibly, room for weaves. Oooo I wonder if you could just weave a fireball INSIDE the armor!! That'd be splendid!
Additionally, we don't know how the OP acts against c-dar in a non-aggressive manner. So some more potential possibilities. If you wrapped ropes of Air around a warrior in such armor, would the c-dar allow him to "break" the ropes? If you created a ground sink so that he sank up to his waist, would the c-dar allow him to just "swim" through the earth like it was water or quicksand?
There are any number of means that a channeler could, easily, neutralize and/or kill a warrior in c-dar. I'm not saying it wouldn't be a benefit, I just don't think it'd be a benefit worth the effort.
Result: at least entombing the warriors for a length of time, potentially suffocating or crushing them. Probably will snap necks on impact if large/solid enough mass.
2) Channelers: create massive fire around warrior (Either with OP or by lighting the area on fire)
Result: suffocation of warrior as oxygen is consumed and, potentially, smoke fumes are produced
3) Channeler: Suck the air out of an area, creating a vacuum
Result: suffocation (do you sense a theme here? )
Just like any armor, there will be weak and/or unprotected points that could also be exploited by simple arrows, not to mention mind-guided arrows, swords and daggers of air. And, as a more insidious method, to one use spirit to sap the life from a warrior be flowing draining weaves between the armor joints? There woudl have to be room for movement, thus room for air and thus, feasibly, room for weaves. Oooo I wonder if you could just weave a fireball INSIDE the armor!! That'd be splendid!
Additionally, we don't know how the OP acts against c-dar in a non-aggressive manner. So some more potential possibilities. If you wrapped ropes of Air around a warrior in such armor, would the c-dar allow him to "break" the ropes? If you created a ground sink so that he sank up to his waist, would the c-dar allow him to just "swim" through the earth like it was water or quicksand?
There are any number of means that a channeler could, easily, neutralize and/or kill a warrior in c-dar. I'm not saying it wouldn't be a benefit, I just don't think it'd be a benefit worth the effort.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 14/02/2012 at 09:57:19 PM
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1405 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 851 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 757 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 902 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 948 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 919 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 842 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 685 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 754 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 656 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 798 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 639 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 655 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 768 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 646 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 745 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 684 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 697 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 800 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 639 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 657 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 688 Views
Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 750 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 734 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 698 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 602 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 734 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 625 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 749 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 917 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 695 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 635 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 645 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 619 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 761 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 655 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 817 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 643 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 630 Views