RJ never really explains how it interacts with the OP, but direct use of the OP against it just makes it "harder".
It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.
Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.
**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
It would stand to reason that the armor would offer protection to some greater or lesser effect against direct OP assault (exploding heads from Ashaman, or Aes Sedai fireballs) and would offere some sort of protection from even indirect assault due to its natural properties (non-conductive, resistant to traumatic impact, etc.) Not saying that an individual channeller couldn't stop a swordsman in full cuendillar plate, helm, and shield 1 on 1, but a group that were so equipped would be much more resistant to the efforts of a channeler trying to stop them with the standard OP indirect effects used in battles.
Even the deathgates and arrows of fire that Rand and Logain used in the big trollock battle would be of greatly reduced effectiveness.
**side note for discussion/speculation, can the edge of a gateway cut cuendillar?
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1477 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 942 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 842 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 994 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 1030 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 1003 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 927 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 770 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 845 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 734 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 869 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 721 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 736 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 849 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 730 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 834 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 780 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 782 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 891 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 723 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 742 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 766 Views

Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 844 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 817 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 778 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 685 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 792 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 706 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 837 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 1000 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 768 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 708 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 720 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 706 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 857 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 738 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 909 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 723 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 710 Views