Active Users:666 Time:26/03/2026 02:51:33 AM
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
Who would you make them for anyway? It's not like the Generals get personally involved in the fighting and there is no way to mass produce the things for the common soldiers or even the lower level officers.



The cloaks are cool and all, but take the best swordsmen in the world, receiving the physical gifts of the bond, and encase them in unbreakable, lightweight armor, and you have a force capable of going through most armies, even channeling ones.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1699 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1172 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 606 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1096 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1169 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 561 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1074 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1243 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 1039 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 604 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 1046 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1200 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 523 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1301 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1091 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 1079 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1083 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1087 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1174 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 1026 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1081 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 969 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1128 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 950 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 954 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1071 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 966 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 934 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 662 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 1041 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 1016 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 1002 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1104 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 980 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 938 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 1065 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 1041 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 1004 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 932 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 1065 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 945 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1099 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1264 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 947 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 925 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1120 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 964 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 961 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1122 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 981 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 940 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 1071 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 585 Views

Reply to Message