Active Users:622 Time:23/02/2025 10:17:51 AM
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
is that plate armor NEEDS to dent. It needs to cushion the blow and conduct a transfer of energy. Unless c-dar absorbs all the energy you put into it (if I remember correctly, it doesn't), it's going to be worse than metal.


And, regardless, it's just not an efficient process. Others have pointed out the flaws with both production and who would wear it. There's no point in giving it to the generals (they aren't on the lines), and you can't produce it in high enough quantities to make it worth distributing to the common solider.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 13/02/2012 at 02:38:18 PM
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1461 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 924 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 490 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 828 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 927 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 451 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 823 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1016 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 808 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 490 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 796 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 932 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 417 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 988 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 863 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 827 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 825 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 860 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 911 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 754 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 825 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 718 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 855 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 704 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 718 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 831 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 713 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 703 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 563 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 819 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 764 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 769 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 876 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 709 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 728 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 828 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 798 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 764 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 667 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 776 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 692 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 823 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 984 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 706 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 694 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 841 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 720 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 724 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 894 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 705 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 696 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 756 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 458 Views

Reply to Message