Active Users:984 Time:14/11/2024 11:15:53 PM
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1401 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 851 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 454 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 755 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 854 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 416 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 750 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 947 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 741 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 455 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 726 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 848 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 386 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 919 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 791 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 757 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 754 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 799 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 839 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 684 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 751 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 654 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 792 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 638 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 651 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 767 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 643 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 636 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 531 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 744 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 679 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 693 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 796 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 638 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 655 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 749 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 733 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 696 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 600 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 734 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 622 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 748 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 913 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 642 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 615 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 757 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 653 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 648 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 815 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 642 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 626 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 691 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 422 Views

Reply to Message