Active Users:1112 Time:22/11/2024 02:57:12 PM
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:

-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.

-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).

-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.


No, you are wrong. Both scale and fully plate armor would be not only be completely viable but much easier to make than chain. They would also provider protection from not only slashing (like chain mail) but piercing and bludgeoning (as much as any feudal armor can and better than any in history) weapons.

The argument (and that is giving it too much credit) that cuendillar's unbreakable nature would lend to increased damage by blunt force trauma is ridiculous and ignore the very basic tenants of physics.
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1406 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 852 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 455 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 757 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 855 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 417 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 751 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 949 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 743 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 457 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 728 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 854 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 389 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 920 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 794 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 759 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 755 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 803 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 843 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 686 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 755 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 657 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 798 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 640 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 656 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 769 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 646 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 638 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 532 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 746 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 685 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 697 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 801 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 640 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 658 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 750 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 735 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 698 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 603 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 735 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 625 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 750 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 918 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 646 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 620 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 762 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 655 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 650 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 818 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 644 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 631 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 694 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 424 Views

Reply to Message