Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
If you support this idea, why? What prevents it from protecting against bludgeoning?
This message last edited by Nargs on 10/02/2012 at 11:10:49 PM
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1438 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 894 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 797 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 950 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 986 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 957 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 885 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 723 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 797 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 693 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 829 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 671 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 690 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 804 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 683 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 787 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 729 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 735 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 841 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 676 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 697 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 727 Views
Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 798 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 771 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 740 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 643 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 766 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 665 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 790 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 953 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 735 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 669 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 678 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 661 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 807 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 692 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 861 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 680 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 668 Views