Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
If you support this idea, why? What prevents it from protecting against bludgeoning?
This message last edited by Nargs on 10/02/2012 at 11:10:49 PM
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1405 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 851 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 757 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 903 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 948 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 919 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 842 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 685 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 754 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 656 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 798 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 639 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 655 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 768 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 646 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 746 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 684 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 697 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 800 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 639 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 657 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 688 Views
Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 750 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 734 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 698 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 602 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 734 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 625 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 749 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 917 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 695 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 635 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 645 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 619 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 761 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 655 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 817 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 644 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 630 Views