Active Users:574 Time:17/12/2025 09:18:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I suppose I am on a... Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
I suppose I am on a yearly cycle of thought.

Should I post in the year old thread (and get flamed for doing so) if I want to bring up the subject again? Is it not possible to find someone that may have new ideas or different points of views now than a year ago? Are there any new RAFO peeps that were not around a year ago and have never considered the theory before and would do so now only because this topic is showing up at the top of the message board?

The way I see it... the board is dead now more than ever. If you want it to remain dead then by all means... detract.

Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1644 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 1107 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 577 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 1030 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 1107 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 531 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 1002 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 1141 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1175 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 968 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 574 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 981 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 1134 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 491 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1232 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 1028 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 999 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 1005 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 1020 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 1099 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 947 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 1010 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 916 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 1045 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 884 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 895 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 1001 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 889 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 860 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 636 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 979 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 945 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 930 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 1043 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 902 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 873 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 913 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 995 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 977 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 932 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 849 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 992 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 866 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 1032 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1199 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 961 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 893 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 884 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 858 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 1036 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 894 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 896 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 1048 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 903 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 873 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 986 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 555 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes