Active Users:3262 Time:22/01/2025 05:36:57 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:

-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.

-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).

-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1438 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 895 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 475 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 797 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 899 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 435 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 796 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 950 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 986 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 786 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 477 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 768 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 893 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 405 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 957 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 831 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 793 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 793 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 834 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 885 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 724 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 797 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 694 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 829 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 671 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 690 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 805 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 683 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 678 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 552 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 787 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 729 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 735 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 842 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 676 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 698 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 727 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 798 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 771 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 740 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 643 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 766 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 666 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 790 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 953 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 735 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 669 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 678 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 661 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 807 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 693 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 694 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 862 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 680 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 669 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 735 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 440 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes