Active Users:742 Time:23/12/2024 06:50:37 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM
But I'll recap the general jist of what was said:

-Cuendillar is presumably completely inflexible, therefore we'd need to make it similar to chain-mail, i.e. links, to make small pieces that are flexible with respect to each other.

-This appears difficult, because the individual cuendillar pieces could not be touching when merged together (although I'm sure they could simply interleave flows of Air and it wouldn't be all that hard).

-The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? Nargs - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1415 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Marshall - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 863 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* Dark Knight - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 465 Views
I suppose I am on a... Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 772 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. LadyLorraine - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 869 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* Nargs - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 422 Views
I rest my case. Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 769 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion Nargs - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM 918 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 962 Views
Agreed. Narg - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 759 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* Japhy - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 465 Views
See? Nargs - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 744 Views
Possible, but hard. Gher - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 865 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 395 Views
My thought was always about weapons. j-whitt987 - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 932 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. Evil_Monkey - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 805 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 772 Views
Should be perfectly feasible TheUltimateReality - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 768 Views
Exactly HyogaRott - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 813 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item darius_sedai - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 855 Views
Ummm, Warders... HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 699 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? Fanatic-Templar - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 770 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 668 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. LadyLorraine - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 808 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. Nargs - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 650 Views
which way is it? LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 666 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 783 Views
That's really not my point. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 661 Views
My point is HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 651 Views
Agree on all points *NM* Nargs - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 542 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 761 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 700 Views
Not nesecarrily HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 708 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 813 Views
..and you are creating new tactics HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 652 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action LadyLorraine - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 671 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM 701 Views
Not accurate darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 774 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 745 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 713 Views
If armor is of no benefit... HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 617 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 749 Views
nope HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 639 Views
*Shrug* darius_sedai - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 768 Views
Re: *Shrug* HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 929 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech darius_sedai - 16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM 712 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech HyogaRott - 16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM 646 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 656 Views
Maybe, maybe not HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 633 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not Fanatic-Templar - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 778 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 668 Views
Fair enough. Fanatic-Templar - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 665 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 834 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error HyogaRott - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 659 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p Nargs - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 639 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. HyogaRott - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 708 Views
Two things: *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 427 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes