Active Users:557 Time:23/12/2024 04:43:44 AM
Look, Mr. Jordan said THIS: beelaa Send a noteboard - 31/01/2012 01:21:00 PM
I almost couldn't find this quote:

He warns that the final book will come, but "It's not going to resolve everything. In the last scene of the last book, I'm going to set a hook." This would lead to, or at least suggest, a possible future beyond the end of the series. It sill suggest that there's more to tell and more stories to come, but "I'm not going to write them." He says that's the way it is in the real world. One of the problems with a lot of books and movies is that all the problems of the main characters, the secondary and tertiary characters, their city, state, country and world... everything is resolved. He wants to "leave [us] with a belief that this world is still going on and living."


I think this statement is very clear. No epilogue, No what happened with x, y and z etc.

Think the ending of the new movie, The Grey.

That was the original plan. I'm not a Jordan purist (like some friends of mine) but I think Sanderson is going into the wrong way.

1. cutting the last book into three - well, I could live with that
2. cutting the prologue into three parts - well, I could live with that
3. write filler parts to get the 300.000 words per books - well, I could live with that

But this, erase the original ending by epilogues ... I think this is really too much.

Reply to message
What does that mean? - 29/01/2012 09:09:53 AM 1240 Views
Re: What does that mean? - 29/01/2012 09:16:09 AM 900 Views
Re: What does that mean? - 29/01/2012 11:22:44 AM 861 Views
Re: What does that mean? - 29/01/2012 03:26:48 PM 742 Views
50K minimal? o-o *NM* - 30/01/2012 10:28:43 AM 305 Views
A lot of it is probably rough outlines - 30/01/2012 09:06:32 PM 705 Views
not sure if this is even what you're asking - 30/01/2012 04:33:29 PM 676 Views
Look, Mr. Jordan said THIS: - 31/01/2012 01:21:00 PM 866 Views
Uhm, NOTHING in that statement precludes an epilogue. - 31/01/2012 03:51:37 PM 631 Views
Re: Uhm, NOTHING in that statement precludes an epilogue. - 05/02/2012 04:26:23 PM 930 Views
I think you simply misinterpreted what Jordan really meant - 05/02/2012 03:44:12 PM 684 Views

Reply to Message