Active Users:1196 Time:22/11/2024 08:25:52 PM
The same "step" you refer to seperates Egwene from normal Aes Sedai according to RJ... Shannow Send a noteboard - 14/12/2011 07:14:55 PM
I really don't see why that single quote, way early in the series, and by no means even remotely accurate, should give any definition to a possible strength list.

The only way the candle to bonfire comparison makes sense is if Egwene is strength 1 or 2 to Nynaeve's 95, which is so out of the realm of possibility as to be ludicrous.

The facts we have point to Nynaeve not being able to shield Elayne even when Elayne is drink-addled via her bond. We have Moghedien's statement that Elayne was definitely not a pushover in strength. We have RJ's statement that Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha were a step below the Foresaken. We have Egwene laying traps in her apartment, ready to duke it out with the OP with Mesaana, with no mention of even an angreal.


In RJ's own words, which you conveniently only partially quoted above, Egwene is one step below the Forsaken and one step above modern day Aes Sedai.

In other words, Egwene lies equidistant between modern Aes Sedai and the female Forsaken. To put it in plain English, she is halfway up the ladder between normal Aes Sedai and the female Forsaken.

So if Moghedien is at 80 and Egwene at 70, then Moiraine is at 60.

Kind of problematic, seeing as Egwene is roughly as strong as Amys and Melaine combined...

The bonfire vs candle comparison is meant to indicate that Nynaeve is in a whole different ballpark to Egwene.

It is hyperbole. It is quite ridiculous for you to suggest that they were trying to compare the candlepower or lumens, to use a flashlight term, of a bonfire to an equivalent number of candles, as you are trying to make out in order to deliberately ridicule this otherwise valid statement.

I understand why you do it, because you have to, in order to prevent your entire fabricated strength ratio from falling apart.

But the reality is that it was meant to indicate that Nynaeve is at Forsaken level, which is as far removed from Egwene's level as Egwene is from Moiraine's.

Just like a burning candle is on a whole new level to a brief, small spark, representing normal Aes Sedai, so a bonfire is on a whole diffirent level to the candle.

It is all there, patently clear. If you have the will to accept it.

Reply to message
Underestimating Forsaken strength - 11/12/2011 05:57:22 AM 1871 Views
Ah, my favourite topic makes a return... - 11/12/2011 07:45:29 AM 773 Views
Re: Ah, my favourite topic makes a return... - 11/12/2011 10:25:03 PM 789 Views
Yes, you are probably correct - 12/12/2011 06:26:07 AM 890 Views
Re: and some of the information given to us is flawed - 12/12/2011 07:38:59 PM 696 Views
The real question is - What percentage of her full strength did Nynaeve achieve by Book 4? - 12/12/2011 08:31:30 PM 728 Views
I find that unlikely - 12/12/2011 09:28:07 PM 696 Views
Easy question for you: Based on the evidence, what percentage of her strength was Nynaeve at in tSR? - 13/12/2011 07:09:56 AM 666 Views
Well.... - 13/12/2011 01:12:48 PM 729 Views
Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 01:36:45 PM 734 Views
Re: Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 02:06:14 PM 763 Views
Re: Well there we have it - 13/12/2011 02:12:10 PM 699 Views
Alivia may not even be stronger than Nynaeve... - 14/12/2011 03:14:06 AM 771 Views
That wouldn't surprise me actually *NM* - 14/12/2011 07:46:47 AM 403 Views
Where would you place Egwene though? - 14/12/2011 09:13:46 AM 680 Views
Re: Where would you place Egwene though? - 14/12/2011 12:53:49 PM 678 Views
Bonfire next to a candle indeed. Hehehe... - 14/12/2011 05:50:34 PM 820 Views
- 14/12/2011 06:56:40 PM 633 Views
The same "step" you refer to seperates Egwene from normal Aes Sedai according to RJ... - 14/12/2011 07:14:55 PM 662 Views
Yes! And...? - 15/12/2011 02:53:37 AM 670 Views
Yes I would agree with that - 14/12/2011 08:24:35 PM 822 Views
Alivia with an angreal > > > Cyndane - 14/12/2011 08:50:41 PM 599 Views
No - 14/12/2011 09:10:34 PM 686 Views
That makes no sense. - 14/12/2011 09:13:48 PM 751 Views
Correct. - 14/12/2011 09:43:53 PM 693 Views
Re: Correct. - 15/12/2011 05:54:37 AM 688 Views
So many instances of logical laziness in that post... - 14/12/2011 10:01:45 PM 1127 Views
Re: So many instances of logical laziness in that post... - 15/12/2011 06:16:01 AM 611 Views
Only slight diffence I have is regarding general AS strength - 30/12/2011 04:45:49 PM 704 Views
I think it was just Aes Sedai hyperbole - 15/12/2011 09:51:00 PM 555 Views
And entirely based off your shared assumption. - 14/12/2011 05:15:51 AM 758 Views
Actually that's a lot of logical assumption. *NM* - 13/12/2011 01:28:00 PM 338 Views
But... - 14/12/2011 03:06:15 AM 557 Views
And - 30/12/2011 05:07:13 PM 658 Views
Yes - 13/12/2011 04:16:40 PM 814 Views
Re: Yes - 13/12/2011 04:47:17 PM 716 Views
Nah. Beyond the realm of possibility. Sorry, - 13/12/2011 05:12:40 PM 777 Views
There are a number of comments from Q&As that shows that this is possible and more complex. - 13/12/2011 08:23:49 PM 741 Views
None of which I disagree with, but a far cry from women being weaker just due to believing it... - 13/12/2011 08:39:40 PM 650 Views
But that is my point: it wouldn't be merely force of will. - 13/12/2011 09:40:17 PM 637 Views
What Rand is doing... - 14/12/2011 03:43:08 AM 760 Views
That would make sense given Min's vision - 16/12/2011 04:37:56 PM 561 Views
Wait.. I DIDN'T write that! - 14/12/2011 03:02:04 AM 638 Views
Reply to your question of - "Why use Logain gateway comparison as evidence:" - 17/12/2011 03:08:19 PM 733 Views
You're basically saying "correlation equals causation"... - 18/12/2011 06:18:47 AM 678 Views
On gateways - 18/12/2011 07:17:09 AM 718 Views
Might assume that Elayne is stronger in the Power than Aviendha. - 19/12/2011 02:40:46 PM 914 Views
I suspect he knows that... - 19/12/2011 05:53:00 PM 631 Views
Nope...some maths problems in your post. - 19/12/2011 07:41:29 PM 681 Views
But 64 square feet is not Elayne's maximum... - 20/12/2011 02:46:50 AM 632 Views
But Shielding is also relative. - 27/12/2011 09:35:11 PM 1889 Views
Re: Underestimating Forsaken strength - 22/12/2011 05:24:53 PM 675 Views

Reply to Message