Active Users:867 Time:23/12/2024 10:58:43 AM
Particularly in an obviously humor-themed reply & acknowledgment of his point Cannoli Send a noteboard - 12/12/2011 01:42:01 AM
If you're going to be critic to someone on his lack of knowledge on a subject, and be rude, I suggest you get your facts right.

And responding I'm a nerd just proves how puerile and juvenile the majority of your posts are. While you do have some very good arguements on some subjet, your tone and choice of words is poor.

I wonder if you would have the nerve or guts to say half of what you write here in our faces...

I see nothing wrong with the fact that he's willing to debate fiercely. Are you saying he should not make passionate arguments because you, or anyone here, can beat him up in real life? I honestly feel that being able to get heated without the threat of physical violence is a great way for the intellectuals to stand out.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ogiers = real humans, Rand and co. = hobbits? - 09/12/2011 05:44:37 PM 1377 Views
No *NM* - 09/12/2011 08:31:02 PM 551 Views
+1 *NM* - 09/12/2011 08:44:19 PM 401 Views
+∞^2 *NM* - 09/12/2011 09:38:41 PM 359 Views
thank you *NM* - 11/12/2011 11:24:24 PM 477 Views
Nah, and Wot =/= LOTR on steroids - 10/12/2011 01:24:31 AM 914 Views
Also referenced: Queen Elizabeth, Ann Landers, John Glenn, Sally Ride, and the Mercedes-Benz. *NM* - 10/12/2011 05:02:21 AM 470 Views
And Elaida is clearly Ann Coulter. - 15/12/2011 06:16:06 PM 709 Views
+1000 *NM* - 30/12/2011 05:49:50 PM 378 Views
Scouring the Shire WAS in Book 4 for Tolkien as well. Read the damn books already. - 10/12/2011 05:06:03 AM 815 Views
It was in Book 6 of the LotR. - 10/12/2011 07:39:57 AM 822 Views
Sorry but not true. LOTR is seperate from The Hobbit. - 10/12/2011 02:08:23 PM 786 Views
Nerds - 11/12/2011 02:45:14 AM 868 Views
you say that like its a bad thing - 11/12/2011 09:36:27 AM 1109 Views
Well... - 11/12/2011 08:53:26 PM 810 Views
I don't see why that last part is relevant. - 11/12/2011 09:54:26 PM 730 Views
Particularly in an obviously humor-themed reply & acknowledgment of his point - 12/12/2011 01:42:01 AM 728 Views

Reply to Message