I don't truly claim Dark Rand was a bad guy per se, let alone a forsaken. It was just a vehicle to introduce my favorite awesome moments that the real forsaken couldn't do.
Because they are, as you say, sackless idiots. They don't go stomping around as majestic avatars of destruction and terror, because that's a good way to get whacked. They prefer the safety of a hidden refuge, of maneuvering in the shadows, and of ruling behind the walls of a fortress with an army on command. Given the choice, most of them would not show up for Tarmon Gaidon, because they don't care about how badass that would be. The viking mythology is among the most badass, and they're all eager to show at Ragnarok, despite certain knowledge of defeat, while the Forsaken would forsake even a ringside seat to their victory, out of fear of getting killed. There is badass, and there is evil, and the Forsaken are definitively in the latter category and well away from any Venn-diagram intersection of the two. I disagree that Lanfear's actions at the docks make sense given the state she was in. For me it boils down to the fact that RJ won't kill any of the main good guys, which requires some unrealistic behavior on the part of the most powerful bad guys, as well as a heaping portion of the "pattern" forcing things to happen. Sometimes I don't want to see another good guy take a bullet to the shoulder or the thigh. Sometimes it just feels like bad writing.
That's not so much an argument as a protest regarding what kind of scene you would prefer.It seems more likely to me that Lanfear would have been an absolute angel of death in that circumstance.
Why? She was pissed at her boyfriend and jealous at the slut who let him cheat. This was in no way, shape or form the culmination of some master assassination plot or long-range strategy. She got wind that Rand was up to something, showed up to investigate, heard he was sleeping with someone else, and lost her shit. I don't know how that is implausible in the least. Lan getting knocked unconscious was perhaps the worst part of that scene for me. You can always cook up some possible reason for why things make sense. Sometimes it detracts from the story.
And sometimes it just makes sense and is the actual reason. Your scenario is borne of nothing more than a sense of drama and what would have made the most "awesome" scene in your mind, regardless of adherence to any narrative causality.Lanfear didn't care about Lan, except as an object that presumed to threaten her, so she swatted it away like a fly. The Warder bond gives more than enough explanation for why he would survive a simple weave of air to knock him flying.
And by the way, I don't claim my scenario of Lanfear killing Eqwene was likely, you would have to change the entire setup of the scene (as well as the serious obviously). I only give it as an example of something that could have been awesomely bad. This series would be so much more fun if I hated and feared the forsaken.
If they were competent, credence could be given to their own contention that they are simply fighting to allow the most worthy to rule, yet by their own incompetence, we are shown that the Shadow lacks even that virtue, instead allowing incompetents to rise to great power and rulership, and permitting them to stay there, because of the evil deity backing them up. Recall that after three years of winning the war, with the Dark One behind them and growing in power as time passed, and increasingly freeing himself and turning people to his side, LTT knocked them back on their heels and was WINNING the middle part of the war. Eventually, the Dark One's power was too great and forced the Strike at Shayol Ghul, but remember that these nimrods almost lost despite their numerous advantages.
Of course killing Egwene may have evoked gratitude rather than hatred in me.
As for the duel with Ishamael, I guess I don't like that you have to imagine some bizarre circumstances for his actions to make sense. Maybe they were at a cross section of TAR and the real world? Okay, that is a possibility. Yet they fought in plain sight of everybody, people were channeling all around them, Ishamael plainly feared the steel of Rand's sword, it seems they were there in the flesh.
Yes, being visible in the sky to everyone for miles around is a PERFECTLY NATURAL AND NORMAL THING. As for the duel with Ishamael, I guess I don't like that you have to imagine some bizarre circumstances for his actions to make sense. Maybe they were at a cross section of TAR and the real world? Okay, that is a possibility. Yet they fought in plain sight of everybody, people were channeling all around them, Ishamael plainly feared the steel of Rand's sword, it seems they were there in the flesh.
I am not scrounging for an explanation, I am simply offering one of the many possible explanations of the patently and glaringly obviously preternatural circumstances of their encounter. And of course they were there in the flesh - we certainly never saw Rand going to sleep. But Rahvin was in TAR in the flesh when he fought Rand, and how much good did Nynaeve's channeling do against him? Why was Moghedian so terrified of encountering him or Rand? Why, for his killing blow, did Rahvin turn TAR against Rand, rather than use weaves? Plainly the former works better in dream-related stuff than the latter.
In any event, it is obvious that there was SOMETHING supernatural at work and maybe it had to do with the Horn of Valere, but by all appearances, it was Ba'alzamon who initiated the confrontation and thus probably responsible for the circumstances. In such a case, perhaps it was taking all his strength to maintain the theater of conflict.
It seems Ishy could have channeled.
Mere unsupported opinion.
Who is to say he was even capable of channeling, or that his weaves would be able to directly affect Rand? If he was still partially bound, or in some way linked to the Dark One, the distance from Shayol Ghul might have been too great, particularly if he was far gone enough to be exclusively using the True Power, as Moridin later does (the fire-eyes have been reasonably postulated as an advanced stage of the saa). There are all sorts of reasons why channeling might not have worked for him. For one, Rand was linked to the Heroes of the Horn, and channeling had no effect on them either, and Mat, Perrin & Hurin all returned from a battle against damane rather unscathed. Since we have NEVER seen another character channel in identical circumstances, there is no reason to believe that he could.
And if they were there in TAR, then why not do any number of TAR things that Rand again would have no idea how to counter.
Because willpower and belief are stronger than any awareness of technique in T'A'R. All Nynaeve needed to beat Moghedian was the certain knowledge that she had an a'dam about the Forsaken's neck, and all the rest of Moghedian's technique was as dust. Also, I doubt that it was entirely in TAR since even the HotH believe nothing in T'A'R affects the real world. I think they might have been in some halfway state that was projected so strongly into the minds of the surrounding people that they thought they witnessed the battle with their eyes. All sorts of other explanations abound, including a side effect of the Horn, which could also explain the extraordinary abilities displayed by the HotH, including immunity from the Power and riding a horse over water and ship-killing arrows. There was a whole lot of freaky shit going on and too much to assume you know what either party in that fight was capable of. What you say is a possibility, I find it unsatisfactory. I think sometimes RJ just wrote things poorly. I don't assume there is always a great and coherent reason for what happens, even if someone can think up a possible reason for it. Sometimes RJ wanted certain things to happen, and it wasn't always coherent IMO. In a fantasy world you can always come up with a reason to explain things.
In WoT, a liberal application of T'A'R can do that. And your reasoning is unsatisfactory, since all you are doing is refusing to play the game. EVERYTHING is because RJ wanted it that way. He is the very talented writer whose books inspired a large online community. By your own argument, you're just a guy who has a different opinion of what he should have written, and given the success of his version, the evidence would seem to support that vision. The quarterstaff being more powerful than the sword in Randland is beside the point. Rand's knowlege of channeling is almost zero at this point in the series.
So what? This is not some sort of Magic:The Gathering game, where the high card decrees victory in a confrontation. WoT has made it clear that channeling is no more than another weapon. Yes, the guy who brings a knife to a gunfight will probably lose, but that does not mean a guy with a knife can't beat a guy with a gun. The Aes Sedai are, generally speaking, the only channelers in the world (and more importantly, consider themselves the only channelers, and the best channelers), and perfectly able to use the Power in self-defense, as well as in numerous non-weapon capacities, and yet they still bond warders. I think Ishamael was there in body and could have channeled. So yes, to me trying to physically duel with Rand was stupid as it gave Rand his best chance to win, other than the aforementioned sheep shearing contest in which the loser dies.
And you have no evidence for that other than your random opinion. Even if he WAS there in the flesh, there is no proof that his channeling would have worked, or that he was capable of anything other than the True Power, or that the TP would have worked so far from Shayol Ghul with at least four Seals still active, or that it would have worked against the Horn of Valere. Since, as I noted above, the Heroes are protected from the Power, maybe the Sounder of the Horn is protected as well while they are there, which would explain why he did not even bother trying.You may be fine with those scenes. I'm not, they annoy me.
Who cares? I realize that RJ made his forsaken sackless idiots to some extent, I just wish he hadn't. I think evil people are often courageous and formidible.
And those are almost always evil people acting out of good motives or a perverted love for something, like Ingtar, or Couladin, or Byar, or Egwene, or Dark Rand, or the 911 terrorists, or Hitler. People with guts or spines or self-respect are as unlikely to have been as skilled at kissing the Dark One's ass. With courage and valor and determination, particularly if the AoL was the meritocracy it is often perceived as, they would have been able to find success in other ways, and not needed to cultivate the skills of a courtier and sycophant and thus fallen to the treacheries of their contemptible colleagues in the Shadow. And such evil people make much better villains (in stories).
Really? Because most readers, and critics, seem to find complex and multi-dimensional people make better villains. The Wheel of Time series is about overcoming your OWN flaws. It is about an evil that cuts the ground out from under you, while tempting you with power and license. The greatest human threat explicitly since the middle of the series, and even hinted at from the very beginning, has been of good guys going rotten. Aridhol was introduced as a cautionary tale in the very beginning of the series, along with Padan Fain! The greatest menace extant in the world at the start of the series was tainted-saidin, not because it killed the users, but because of the evil deeds it drove them to perform. When Rand learns he can channel his greatest fear is not his own death, which he had already faced, but that he might harm those he loves. The very first thing we see in the series is a man walking through a charnal house of his own making and it is soon made clear that this is a good guy, a hero and savior figure, who has wrought this devastation. WoT is not about external threats, it is about the threat within. The climax of Perrin's private arc is not defeating the Shaido and reclaiming his wife, or beating Galad in a trial or defeating Slayer and inadvertantly helping Rand and Egwene, it is about overcoming his own weaknesses and hesitancy and stepping up to assume the mantle of leadership and responsibility and agreeing to undertake the task necessary. Mat's story is not about his heroic deeds and asses kicked saving Tuon and Moiraine, but of the sacrifice he made for the latter and more importantly, his acceptance of his role as a leader and his ultimate acceptance of the implications of the Aelfinn's prophecy. He first had to accept Tuon as his wife and that enabled him to make the deliberate and conscious offer of half the light of the world. And finally, there is Rand. Anyone who doubts that the ultimate climax of his story was his moment of reflection on the peak of Dragonmount has far too inadequate a grasp of the story to bother talking to. The villains to be overcome in WoT are the characters own flaws and weaknesses. Rand himself, in his apotheosis as the ultimate combination of Dragon and Dragon Reborn, states the reason why he can succeed where LTT failed was that he was brought up better this time. Does this mean that archery or your hypothetical sheep-shearing contest will be the key to Tarmon Gaidon, or could it be because the fight is, and always was, about character, and Rand has that quality to a degree LTT never did?
When the series is viewed in this light, the Forsaken are perfect antagonists. The point is not "Look at how badass Rand is for killing those mighty Dark Lords of power and destruction." The point is "This could be Rand if he fails or falls." The point is, "This is who gets the world if Rand fails or falls." WoT is not about overcoming the Forsaken, it is about overcoming your own worst tendencies and an ultimate villain who would as soon corrupt you and destroy your being and your self and soul as he would your physical body.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Cool Forsaken moments
21/11/2011 02:49:46 PM
- 1472 Views
Moggy torturing Nynaeve, getting shot, and afterwards squashing Liandrin (Moggy's my favourite..) *NM*
21/11/2011 03:49:50 PM
- 357 Views
That's an oxymoron
21/11/2011 06:41:34 PM
- 834 Views
If you disagree with his choice moments then...
21/11/2011 07:48:04 PM
- 802 Views
My top 5 are all different from your list...
21/11/2011 08:51:43 PM
- 1360 Views
Except...
29/11/2011 06:08:37 AM
- 691 Views
My point is that the ILLUSION of Forsaken greatness reflected the REALITY that should have been
29/11/2011 01:58:21 PM
- 713 Views
All the awesomest moments come from the same bad guy.
21/11/2011 09:20:05 PM
- 920 Views
You sort of have a point, that ties in to why the Forsaken suck
22/11/2011 03:37:14 PM
- 726 Views
Some thoughts.
22/11/2011 06:30:04 PM
- 920 Views
Re: Some thoughts.
22/11/2011 09:11:50 PM
- 671 Views
Re: Some thoughts.
22/11/2011 11:09:28 PM
- 910 Views
Any Cadsuane moment. *NM*
24/11/2011 04:45:59 AM
- 374 Views
Oh please! My mother is more evil by 10 A.M. than Cadsuane gets up to all day
24/11/2011 11:05:02 AM
- 594 Views
Re: Oh please! My mother is more evil by 10 A.M. than Cadsuane gets up to all day
30/11/2011 05:29:09 AM
- 685 Views