Much as I dislike disparaging someone elses review of a book, I'd imagine a majority of the people here that voted yes would have been happy for no further reviews if it weren't for the how little the TGS review from Jason can be trusted.
And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.
As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
And that is all due to the now infamous review of Crossroads of Twilight by him. That implied the book was going to be packed with action and events, marking a return to the pace of books 1-6.
As these are going to be spoiler free reviews, I can clearly state (and I wouldn't be the only one), that my reason for wanting to see other reviews pre-release is to see just how accurate his TGS review is. Ie. is TGS REALLY as fast paced as KOD, is it that much darker? Is there a scene most will think is dramatic, etc.
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
- 1609 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
- 431 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
- 495 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
- 867 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
- 453 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
- 757 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
- 426 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
- 419 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
- 839 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
- 810 Views
No
21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
- 828 Views
I think you missread the rules...
21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
- 1289 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
- 795 Views
I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
- 935 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
- 873 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
- 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
- 770 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
- 932 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
- 950 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
- 758 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
- 658 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame?
24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM
- 646 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
- 727 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
- 713 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
- 853 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
- 1003 Views