Active Users:810 Time:15/11/2024 08:55:52 AM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1575 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 923 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 407 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 843 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 413 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 710 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 407 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 459 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 510 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 459 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 464 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 411 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 457 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 723 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 405 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 419 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 820 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 425 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 745 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1012 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 390 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 396 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 401 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 396 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 725 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 456 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 670 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 407 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 409 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 399 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 374 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 747 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 721 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 715 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 434 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 796 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1255 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 762 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 896 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 837 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 763 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 730 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 892 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1130 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 723 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 912 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 648 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 717 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 621 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 815 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 957 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 761 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 844 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 617 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 727 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 377 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 690 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 684 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 810 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 913 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 737 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 963 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 776 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 705 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 435 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 385 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 394 Views

Reply to Message