Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.
That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.
Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.
It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.
This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
- 1583 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
- 422 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
- 487 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
- 844 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
- 448 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
- 732 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
- 415 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
- 410 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
- 828 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
- 787 Views
No
21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
- 805 Views
I think you missread the rules...
21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
- 1265 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
- 772 Views
I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
- 910 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
- 845 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
- 775 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
- 741 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
- 906 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
- 928 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
- 727 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
- 634 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
- 701 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
- 696 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
- 822 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
- 979 Views