Active Users:2475 Time:18/01/2025 10:41:42 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1609 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 953 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 420 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 884 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 428 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 741 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 421 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 472 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 525 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 473 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 480 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 425 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 473 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 758 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 417 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 434 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 856 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 443 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 779 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1050 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 403 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 413 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 417 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 413 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 766 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 471 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 713 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 422 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 423 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 389 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 783 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 763 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 745 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 449 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 828 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1290 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 796 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 936 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 874 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 771 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 933 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1168 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 761 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 950 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 691 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 759 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 658 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 850 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 994 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 800 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 881 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 646 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 769 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 393 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 728 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 714 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 854 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 947 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 767 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1004 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 809 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 733 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 448 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 400 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 408 Views

Reply to Message