Active Users:607 Time:18/12/2024 03:22:50 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1583 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 933 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 412 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 857 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 420 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 717 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 412 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 460 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 516 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 464 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 469 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 415 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 464 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 732 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 409 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 424 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 828 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 432 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 755 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1022 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 396 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 401 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 406 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 400 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 736 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 461 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 685 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 413 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 402 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 379 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 759 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 734 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 726 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 438 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 805 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1265 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 772 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 910 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 845 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 775 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 741 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 906 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1141 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 735 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 928 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 666 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 727 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 634 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 825 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 969 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 776 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 856 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 630 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 743 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 385 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 701 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 696 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 822 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 921 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 749 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 979 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 786 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 712 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 442 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 391 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 400 Views

Reply to Message