Active Users:438 Time:26/04/2025 08:13:01 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1676 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1019 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 451 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 950 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 456 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 803 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 455 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 503 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 551 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 503 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 515 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 455 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 505 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 816 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 449 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 459 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 928 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 469 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 831 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1119 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 437 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 442 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 448 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 491 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 829 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 499 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 768 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 454 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 454 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 450 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 422 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 860 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 821 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 811 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 479 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 890 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1353 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 859 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1007 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 944 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 852 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 831 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 993 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1230 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 827 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1008 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 752 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 828 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 723 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 945 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1061 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 857 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 949 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 747 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 828 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 424 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 793 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 755 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 924 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1013 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 814 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1069 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 874 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 821 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 470 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 430 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 436 Views

Reply to Message