Active Users:337 Time:06/07/2025 02:19:11 AM
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1771 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1111 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 530 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1043 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 534 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 894 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 529 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 583 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 647 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 580 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 590 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 532 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 580 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 906 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 527 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 537 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1024 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 545 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 925 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1211 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 512 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 517 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 525 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 569 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 923 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 575 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 861 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 529 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 530 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 525 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 500 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 955 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 913 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 903 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 558 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 984 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1446 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 954 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1098 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1037 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 949 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 921 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1086 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1323 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 918 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1100 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 845 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 915 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 817 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1037 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1153 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 946 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1042 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 836 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 920 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 500 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 888 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 847 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1019 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1106 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 899 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1166 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 971 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 907 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 548 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 506 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 514 Views

Reply to Message