They have also gone out of their way to present the idea of the Dark One as being completely inscrutable to human understanding. So having the Dark One or Shaidar Haran dole out lackluster punishments puts them on the level as street thugs and allows human judgments such as "petty" and "moronic" to be applied to them.



Maybe you think that is the point of an evil villain. My point was that rape, while disturbing to me, is unimaginative and really cuts both ways - it devalues both characters, and for a series showing an ultimate evil, doesn't seem appropriate.

When Cyndane suggested that her punishment was having her soul crushed every night, basically devaluing her by taking away her claim to the name "Daughter of the Night", I thought that this would have been a fitting punishment for someone who lost their initial gamble badly.



Osan'gar got an unassuming body and Aran'gar got a female body. The latter was ironic. And I do think that there are situations when death is merciful. Death by balefire removes their souls from the reach of the Dark One to inflict further or worse punishments. I would say that Lanfear, Moghedien, Mesaana and Graendal had worse punishments because they had to live through degradation of the idea that they were Chosen and were violated. Rhavin and Bel'al got off lightly. Would the Dark One have punished him if they survived? We don't know, but we do know that both went out in a big blaze of glory so some element of their characters still looked impressive and appropriately villainous. Semirhage, in contrast, had every element of her persona destroyed in one scene so that by the end of it, what we remember is her getting spanked by a gray-haired younger channeler.



It is the different viewpoints that make a message board or discussion forum interesting, in my opinion. You think this was an appropriate punishment and I think it is lackluster.