Active Users:547 Time:18/12/2024 03:18:43 PM
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
I really didn't. I assumed if someone had a copy there was a reason, like they were supposed to share their opinion.


That's precisely the point of ARCs, and nowadays publishers love to use non-traditional medias, like Blogs, fan sites etc. Tons more ARC are distributed around, and leftovers are often given away in contests weeks before the book is released etc.

And if Tor is sending out copies before Oct. 27 after all, there's no harm no foul in publishing reviews - that would be why they send copies to people in the first place. But for TGS, it appears every reviewer who asked have been told "Sorry, no ARC printed for TGS, we can get you a copy for release day".

When reputable people/bloggers with established ties to publishers (incl. a few experienced reviewers like Larry from OF and Ken of nethspace, Pat's Fantasy Blog, Adam from Wertzone etc.) start posting reviews, the odds jo-blo poster on a MB has also gotten a copy somehow will be increased a little, but for now you can count on those reviews being fake or from copies obtained illegally.

Normally, there would be more than Jason having a review up by this point. Back in the day, TL, Wot Encyclopedia, Wotmania, Tarvalon.net would all have non spoiler reviews up by this point, and some online media would publish theirs too. There may well be more reviews down the line for all I know, but it's also well known how much Harriet, Brandon and co. dislike spoilers - an this ought to be respected. Some love to use spoilers and half-spoilers as a mean to generate hype, but it's never been the case with WOT. Back in August Brandon didn't even want to mention in Q&A vague stuff he was aware had been officially released - even which two story lines were the focus of the book. He knew it was around, even told people who wanted to know where to look for the info, but he wouldn't speak of it openly (nor does he do on his blog, where he's extremely careful about the information he shares - no doubt knowing very well it's gonna be everywhere after that, and considered legitimate to spread without warning).

The secrets of the book being spread around would not harm Tor's sales, but they sure would piss off Harriet, Brandon etc. Most fans want to discover those for themselves in the book itself - not by accident coming on a MB, whether the spoilers are real or invented by morons with nothing better to do than pulling starved fans' legs.

We waited five years, what's five more weeks before we can judge TGS for ourselves and with a fresh eye anyway?
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1582 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 932 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 412 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 857 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 420 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 717 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 412 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 460 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 516 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 464 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 468 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 415 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 464 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 732 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 408 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 424 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 828 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 432 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 755 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1022 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 396 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 401 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 406 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 400 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 736 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 461 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 684 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 413 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 402 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 379 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 759 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 733 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 726 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 438 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 805 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1265 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 772 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 910 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 845 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 775 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 741 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 905 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1141 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 735 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 928 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 666 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 727 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 634 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 825 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 969 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 776 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 856 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 630 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 743 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 385 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 701 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 696 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 822 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 921 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 749 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 978 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 786 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 712 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 442 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 391 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 400 Views

Reply to Message