Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.
Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?
I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?
Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.
NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
- 1609 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
- 432 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
- 496 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
- 867 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
- 454 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
- 758 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
- 427 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
- 419 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
- 839 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
- 810 Views
No
21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
- 828 Views
I think you missread the rules...
21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
- 1290 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
- 796 Views
I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
- 936 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
- 874 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
- 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
- 771 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
- 933 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
- 1169 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
- 950 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
- 759 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
- 658 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
- 728 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
- 714 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
- 854 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
- 1004 Views