Active Users:2472 Time:18/01/2025 10:42:06 PM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.

NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O

This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1609 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 953 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 420 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 884 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 428 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 741 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 421 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 472 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 525 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 473 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 480 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 425 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 473 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 758 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 417 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 434 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 856 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 443 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 779 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1050 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 403 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 413 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 417 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 413 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 766 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 471 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 713 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 422 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 423 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 389 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 783 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 763 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 745 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 449 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 828 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1290 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 796 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 936 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 874 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 771 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 933 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1169 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 761 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 950 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 691 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 759 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 658 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 850 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 994 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 800 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 881 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 646 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 769 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 393 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 728 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 714 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 854 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 947 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 768 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1004 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 809 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 733 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 448 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 400 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 408 Views

Reply to Message