Active Users:686 Time:23/02/2025 11:40:32 PM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
Are you willing to be the one who makes sure the poster actually has a pre-release copy? Or are you just willing to make more work for someone else? If you are actually willing to do the actual work, how pray tell will you do that? What kind of proof can the reviewers provide? Scanned copyright page? anybody can fake those. ISBN #? already published. Get real man.


I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Umm...You ever heard of Napster? All it would take would be one quote from the book and TOR would be completely within it's rights to shut RAFO down. Are YOU personally willing to be legally responsible for something that someone posts here? Sorry but I'm not. And sure, anybody at any time can post anything here. But by providing a spot for pirates to post what they want, the situation changes to "abetting and encouraging".


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

If the admins have a serious concern about legal liability, I say don't allow the reviews. If the only serious concern is one of authenticity/credibility, though, I don't see the problem. RAFO isn't vauching for the reviews in any way, and no WoT sites that I know of have been made laughing stocks in the past over silly or just plain inaccurate reviews.
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 22/09/2009 at 12:23:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1652 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 992 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 437 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 928 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 442 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 776 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 440 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 488 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 539 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 491 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 501 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 438 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 490 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 793 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 434 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 446 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 899 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 456 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 806 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1090 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 423 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 428 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 435 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 460 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 803 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 485 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 744 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 437 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 439 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 434 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 406 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 828 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 795 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 785 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 464 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 865 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1328 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 832 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 977 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 916 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 829 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 806 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 968 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1203 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 801 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 980 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 728 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 802 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 697 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 888 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1032 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 830 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 920 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 705 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 803 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 408 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 767 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 727 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 900 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 986 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 784 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1044 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 845 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 779 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 457 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 418 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 424 Views

Reply to Message