Active Users:330 Time:06/07/2025 01:57:51 AM
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
You can then consider me as a 'no'.
I saud yes because I thought the question was: "would it bother you if..." which wouldn't because I think I won't come often on the wotboard while I'm reading TGS

deleting bogus posts? In addition if they are completely spoiler free what's the point? Do you really care if dude xyz hated it? or that ms abc didn't like the gawyn parts? Is that really going to make a difference if you buy the book or not? Of couse not. I just don't see it. Why pander to such stuff? Everybody says "don't feed the trolls" but here we are on the verge of no only feeding them but inviting them in, giving them a place to stay and three squares a day.

But it looks like it's going to happen anyway. Guess I'll be spending my time over at 13th depository.

NaCl(I'll just express my displeasure with my feet)H2O


I've been against it from the beginning, but the board seems to be indifferent to the issues at hand, namely that...

1. Tor insisted this week once again that there are no pre-release copies, and that Jason is the only one who has access to the book.

2. That pre-release distribution of the book is a copyright infringement which Tor are serious about nailing down on. RAFO will become a focal point for every person who has messed with Tor, even if they have done so unwittingly.

3. Even if there are decent reviews, there are bound to be hoaxes and lies which will damage our reputation as posters or as a place with worthy content.

4. Risking our reputation and exposing the board to all manner of trash is not worth it when the book is coming out in 5 weeks anyway. We've had the Prologue and the first chapter, and to go beserk for the rest of the book is utterly pointless.

Despite this, I'm a man of my word. I said I'd do what the board wants. I'll make a post at the top of the page for any pre-release content, but I'm not going to check on it even once. I'd like to enjoy the actual book when it comes out, and I don't take responsibility for what's in there. If people want pre-review reviews, they must expose themselves to potential lies and hoaxes, because I haven't read the book and I don't know what's true and what isn't. There will still be no spoilers on the main board, and people can access that post at their free will, albeit with my objections.
Lady Isa
nominated WoTboard's Moiraine AND Mesaana
Member of the Fearsome Four
Bonded to Sidious and Phil
Cindy is one Green Redneck
*MySmiley*
Wotmania Forever
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1771 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1111 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 530 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1043 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 534 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 894 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 529 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 583 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 647 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 580 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 590 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 532 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 580 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 906 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 527 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 537 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1024 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 545 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 925 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1211 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 512 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 517 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 525 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 569 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 923 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 575 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 861 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 529 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 530 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 525 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 500 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 955 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 913 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 903 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 558 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 984 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1446 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 954 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1098 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1037 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 949 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 921 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1086 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1323 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 918 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1100 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 845 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 915 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 817 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1037 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1153 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 946 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1042 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 836 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 920 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 500 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 888 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 847 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1019 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1105 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 899 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1166 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 971 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 907 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 548 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 506 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 514 Views

Reply to Message