Active Users:2347 Time:18/01/2025 10:27:09 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
You can then consider me as a 'no'.
I saud yes because I thought the question was: "would it bother you if..." which wouldn't because I think I won't come often on the wotboard while I'm reading TGS

deleting bogus posts? In addition if they are completely spoiler free what's the point? Do you really care if dude xyz hated it? or that ms abc didn't like the gawyn parts? Is that really going to make a difference if you buy the book or not? Of couse not. I just don't see it. Why pander to such stuff? Everybody says "don't feed the trolls" but here we are on the verge of no only feeding them but inviting them in, giving them a place to stay and three squares a day.

But it looks like it's going to happen anyway. Guess I'll be spending my time over at 13th depository.

NaCl(I'll just express my displeasure with my feet)H2O


I've been against it from the beginning, but the board seems to be indifferent to the issues at hand, namely that...

1. Tor insisted this week once again that there are no pre-release copies, and that Jason is the only one who has access to the book.

2. That pre-release distribution of the book is a copyright infringement which Tor are serious about nailing down on. RAFO will become a focal point for every person who has messed with Tor, even if they have done so unwittingly.

3. Even if there are decent reviews, there are bound to be hoaxes and lies which will damage our reputation as posters or as a place with worthy content.

4. Risking our reputation and exposing the board to all manner of trash is not worth it when the book is coming out in 5 weeks anyway. We've had the Prologue and the first chapter, and to go beserk for the rest of the book is utterly pointless.

Despite this, I'm a man of my word. I said I'd do what the board wants. I'll make a post at the top of the page for any pre-release content, but I'm not going to check on it even once. I'd like to enjoy the actual book when it comes out, and I don't take responsibility for what's in there. If people want pre-review reviews, they must expose themselves to potential lies and hoaxes, because I haven't read the book and I don't know what's true and what isn't. There will still be no spoilers on the main board, and people can access that post at their free will, albeit with my objections.
Lady Isa
nominated WoTboard's Moiraine AND Mesaana
Member of the Fearsome Four
Bonded to Sidious and Phil
Cindy is one Green Redneck
*MySmiley*
Wotmania Forever
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1609 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 431 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 952 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 419 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 883 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 428 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 740 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 421 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 471 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 524 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 495 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 472 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 480 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 425 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 473 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 867 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 453 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 757 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 417 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 434 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 855 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 443 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 779 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1049 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 402 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 412 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 426 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 417 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 413 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 766 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 471 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 712 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 421 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 422 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 419 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 412 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 388 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 782 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 763 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 744 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 839 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 810 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 448 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 828 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1289 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 795 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 935 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 874 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 770 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 932 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1168 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 761 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 950 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 690 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 758 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 658 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 849 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 994 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 800 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 880 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 646 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 768 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 393 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 727 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 713 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 853 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 946 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 767 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1003 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 808 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 733 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 448 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 400 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 408 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes