Then it would have been extraordinarily simple to just have her killed when Rand balefires Natrin's Barrow, and then have Aran'gar carry out the plot against Perrin, and be killed/mindtrapped for his failure.
Yes.
I think the way her story has gone indicates that she still has a role.
No.
IMO no one's perfect and that's just a badly handled plot thread.
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Where could we see Graendal? *spoiler if you haven't read ToM, which you should have by now 
*
- 22/06/2011 04:46:39 PM
1333 Views
*
- 22/06/2011 04:46:39 PM
1333 Views
Re: Where could we see Graendal? *spoiler if you haven't read ToM, which you should have by now *
- 22/06/2011 07:24:24 PM
902 Views
*
- 22/06/2011 07:24:24 PM
902 Views
"You will never forget" implies that there will be a long future in which to remember her punishment
- 24/06/2011 03:39:44 PM
786 Views
Do you think she'll be sent off to a vacuole?
- 24/06/2011 03:53:34 PM
760 Views
I'd be surprised if we see her again. Her character has served it's purpose
- 24/06/2011 04:22:49 PM
719 Views
Nah...
- 24/06/2011 06:02:17 PM
886 Views
Certainly possible, but it seems unnecessary to move the story forward at this point
- 25/06/2011 01:57:39 PM
763 Views
Then why not just kill her?
- 25/06/2011 04:49:44 PM
755 Views
Because RJ likes poetic justice...
- 26/06/2011 09:38:36 PM
746 Views
Re: Then why not just kill her?
- 27/06/2011 05:01:12 PM
804 Views