Active Users:2441 Time:18/01/2025 10:32:15 PM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1609 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 953 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 419 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 883 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 428 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 740 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 421 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 471 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 524 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 472 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 480 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 425 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 473 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 757 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 417 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 434 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 855 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 443 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 779 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1050 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 402 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 413 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 417 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 413 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 766 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 471 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 712 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 421 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 423 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 388 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 783 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 763 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 745 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 448 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 828 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1290 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 796 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 935 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 874 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 796 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 770 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 932 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1168 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 761 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 950 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 690 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 759 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 658 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 849 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 994 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 800 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 880 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 646 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 768 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 393 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 727 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 713 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 853 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 946 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 767 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1003 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 808 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 733 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 448 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 400 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 408 Views

Reply to Message