Active Users:345 Time:26/04/2025 01:40:59 PM
I'm referring to what he tells Min... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 05:17:53 AM
Rand's idea to kill the DO was before his epiphany. From what we know from RJ, such a thing should not be possible at all.

What we do know is that he means to Seal him away again, but better than he did before. That much we can glean from statements he made to people he wouldn't lie to. Similarly, his statement to Min shows that his plan is unformed.

Another reason why this is artificial is precisely because Egwene hasn't given logical reasons for opposing his plan. She's right that risking the DO lose before the very end is foolish. But she has more. Her Dream at least clearly indicates that Rand's plan is very dangerous. She should definitely have shared that with the Wise Ones and Elayne and Nyn, who all believe in her abilities. That she didn't only makes it more possible that this was a result of a shoddily introduced conflict.

As for stuff like the Cleansing... there were more than enough clues to Rand's plan well in advance. RJ never sprung something out of the blue there. It wasn't explicit, but neither was it without multiple clues in the series. This isn't a comparable situation.
Reply to message
Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 04/06/2011 07:21:21 PM 2398 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 04/06/2011 10:26:59 PM 1183 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 05/06/2011 01:55:19 AM 899 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 05/06/2011 12:42:08 PM 970 Views
Well... - 05/06/2011 04:55:26 PM 862 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 04/06/2011 11:38:24 PM 1091 Views
Rand and LTT - 05/06/2011 12:44:54 AM 854 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 05/06/2011 02:08:00 AM 1038 Views
Merrilor - 05/06/2011 09:25:43 AM 840 Views
Rand will break the seals with the purpose of... - 06/06/2011 09:06:43 AM 867 Views
Absurd... - 06/06/2011 03:33:45 PM 819 Views
Re: Rand and Egwene: An artificial conflict? - 10/06/2011 11:16:20 AM 804 Views
I think so, too. - 10/06/2011 02:45:26 PM 869 Views
Nope... - 10/06/2011 05:13:55 PM 824 Views
Re: Nope... - 10/06/2011 07:27:32 PM 756 Views
Re: Nope... - 11/06/2011 02:15:06 AM 824 Views
I'm referring to what he tells Min... - 11/06/2011 05:17:53 AM 748 Views
Re: I'm referring to what he tells Min... - 11/06/2011 11:18:12 AM 879 Views
Re: I'm referring to what he tells Min... - 11/06/2011 05:34:31 PM 793 Views
Re: I'm referring to what he tells Min... - 11/06/2011 07:13:22 PM 827 Views
I really like this idea - 11/06/2011 06:53:34 PM 881 Views
Re: I really like this idea - 11/06/2011 07:16:58 PM 685 Views
Pretty good reason, actually =) get well soon *NM* - 11/06/2011 08:35:44 PM 397 Views
Maybe the problem is the imbecile articulating the conflict. - 03/07/2011 01:20:57 AM 879 Views

Reply to Message