Active Users:1126 Time:23/11/2024 04:16:29 AM
Not necessarily sleepinghour Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM
Instead, having a country with two rulers with equal power would bring it into chaos eventually, very non-borderlander.

Prior to the Seanchan invasion, Tarabon also had two rulers with equal power: the King and Panarch. Amathera wasn't a very good ruler, but nothing says the system couldn't have worked well had both been competent and capable of working together. Which should be easier if the rulers also happen to be married.
Reply to message
Do you realize - 15/05/2011 07:29:13 PM 1961 Views
If only... - 15/05/2011 08:28:45 PM 939 Views
How dare you assume a king outranks an Aes Sedai in his own kingdom and palace?! - 16/05/2011 03:22:19 AM 748 Views
Or any woman for that matter. *NM* - 16/05/2011 01:00:55 PM 320 Views
True, but Aes Sedai are more equal than others. *MN* - 16/05/2011 09:11:40 PM 532 Views
Well actually - 16/05/2011 06:02:57 PM 713 Views
I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 02:01:31 AM 671 Views
Re: I'd be surprised. - 18/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 593 Views
Not necessarily - 19/05/2011 12:33:24 AM 674 Views
That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 05:03:59 AM 620 Views
exactly - 19/05/2011 08:06:43 AM 659 Views
Re: That's an intrinsically flawed system though. - 19/05/2011 09:10:33 AM 757 Views
Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:39:06 PM 722 Views
Re: Where does this come from... - 16/05/2011 06:53:55 PM 769 Views
Ah, I missed that part of the marriage bargain *NM* - 16/05/2011 09:46:34 PM 298 Views
You're mistaken... - 18/05/2011 02:49:51 PM 676 Views
Actually, if there is any truth to her Accepted test, he isn't THAT much in charge. - 17/05/2011 02:51:12 AM 803 Views
Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 05:05:56 AM 659 Views
Re: Not necessarily... - 17/05/2011 06:55:01 PM 578 Views
Ummm... that was exactly my point. - 17/05/2011 11:34:46 PM 615 Views
My point... - 18/05/2011 02:21:56 PM 666 Views
Of course the setting is malleable in TAR. - 19/05/2011 04:21:50 PM 649 Views

Reply to Message