Active Users:745 Time:22/12/2024 08:50:48 PM
Uh whatever! malekithe Send a noteboard - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM
To me it makes sense that every Channeler would have numerous angreal if possible.

Only fairly weak channellers would really need personal angreal, and it sounds like having one was a sign of weakness as most of them are disguised to pass unnoticed as brooches or rings and such, or decorative items you could keep on display and pick up if you need them at home, or carry in a purse. Among the Forsaken, flaunting an angreal is probably the same as admitting you're in fear of the others. The Chosen even mocked (privately or not) those who sought to acquire the big stuff like Callandor. They all wish they had stuff like this, but they won't admit it to the others.

The AOL seemed to favour cooperative efforts (mixed gender ones incl.) over the use of angreal. There's one obvious reason for this: the OP is very addictive. Using angreal regularly isn't a good thing. Another reason was probably that there was no lack of Aes Sedai to join circles back then.

The more powerful stuff, that your average AS never needs except on duty for his or her local Hall, were probably in storage at those local Halls, with even more powerful stuff in the keeping of the Guild's central administration, or at facilities like research centers, factories etc.

As for the Forsaken not coming to SG with a whole arsenal, it seems to me the answer is pretty obvious. They probably all had a collection in a hidden place somewhere, but RJ described the DO as the ultimate paranoid control freak... He totally forbids the use of the OP near the Pit of Doom, killing anyone touching the Source without questions asked... You'd have to be a complete moron to go there with anything ressembling a OP object, especially anything like a OP magnifier...



You always have an answer to everything that makes it seems like RJ never did anything without a reason that made sense in WoT.

Well how about the truth for once?

The Forsaken didn't get angreals, they don't have angreals and they magically ignored all the ones in the Tower because that's what RJ wanted. If they did have them then it wouldn't make much sense why they havent already incinerated Rand and Co.

There, the truth, not some hokey pokey PC answer.
This message last edited by malekithe on 11/05/2011 at 07:36:22 AM
Reply to message
How come every Forsaken wasn’t loaded with angreal when they were sealed in the Bore? - 07/05/2011 02:35:18 AM 2251 Views
Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 08:49:41 AM 1284 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 03:09:51 PM 1154 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 04:29:39 PM 1182 Views
No - 07/05/2011 08:36:49 PM 936 Views
Re: No - 07/05/2011 09:16:18 PM 922 Views
Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:07:31 PM 981 Views
Re: Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:24:21 PM 1091 Views
Which would be a shame. - 09/05/2011 08:17:23 PM 925 Views
There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:08:53 PM 1155 Views
Re: There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:23:14 PM 965 Views
Yeah, but - 07/05/2011 07:30:45 PM 958 Views
They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 08:48:50 PM 1190 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 09:54:11 PM 1045 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 08/05/2011 05:48:01 PM 955 Views
Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM 1360 Views
Re: Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 10:02:40 AM 1114 Views
Meet malekithe. - 11/05/2011 08:06:01 PM 1000 Views
Meet Cannoli - 18/05/2011 07:47:46 AM 1297 Views
Re: Meet Cannoli - 19/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1246 Views
Whatever whatever! - 18/05/2011 07:43:31 AM 1098 Views
But the Dark One could control what the One Power did in Shayol Ghul - 11/05/2011 07:14:43 PM 994 Views
it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 10:18:34 PM 967 Views
Re: it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 11:50:27 PM 937 Views
I was under impression they weren't very aware of the "destroying reality" part - 12/05/2011 06:06:56 AM 894 Views
yep (on both) *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:37:59 AM 491 Views
I think they were at least in some part - 12/05/2011 04:15:26 PM 832 Views
RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 02:13:15 PM 1060 Views
Re: I don't think so - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM 1121 Views
Good points - 08/05/2011 03:13:57 PM 946 Views
well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... - 09/05/2011 06:11:32 AM 994 Views
Do we really *know* that cuendiar is indestructble? - 10/05/2011 02:46:49 PM 964 Views
We don't, although simplicity=/=weakness. Another scenario - 10/05/2011 07:08:57 PM 854 Views
Sort of - 11/05/2011 07:49:10 AM 1285 Views
Re: RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 03:14:20 PM 1005 Views
Not plastic, more like electronics. - 11/05/2011 03:26:53 PM 1061 Views
I missed this post, it's very well thought! *NM* - 19/05/2011 11:26:00 AM 553 Views
my personal theory with other thoughts - 09/05/2011 08:10:34 PM 1004 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 02:10:13 AM 983 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 08:07:50 AM 913 Views
Some people would. - 11/05/2011 02:42:25 PM 963 Views
Re: Some people would. - 11/05/2011 03:01:01 PM 858 Views
It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 03:45:45 PM 1019 Views
Re: It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 04:03:15 PM 836 Views
and if you had prophesy??? *NM* - 04/06/2011 03:10:40 AM 579 Views
My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers - 11/05/2011 07:24:34 PM 953 Views
makes sense *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:36:08 AM 518 Views
Er, though - - 16/05/2011 06:08:55 PM 914 Views
Re: Er, though - - 17/05/2011 12:38:14 PM 829 Views
Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:09:36 PM 1021 Views
Re: Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:15:53 PM 864 Views
I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 950 Views
Re: I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:49:53 PM 910 Views
That makes sense - 17/05/2011 02:16:05 PM 941 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 03:46:04 PM 843 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 04:21:11 PM 867 Views
Re: That makes sense - 18/05/2011 01:18:43 PM 901 Views
That scene was weird - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM 862 Views
Re: That scene was weird - 19/05/2011 10:41:59 AM 847 Views

Reply to Message