Active Users:2888 Time:23/01/2025 01:55:19 AM
Re: I don't think so Watcher Send a noteboard - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM
Making Ter'angreal may not be the same as making angreal etc. The guide and other sources tell us that ter'angreal were quite common as most of the AoL infastructure was powered by the One Power and as such most of the machines were effectivly ter'angreal. Angreal and Sa'angreal were considered more rare so its not too much of a stretch to say that it took a lot more effort and resources to make them.

Secondly you mention Cuendillar being made relativly easily by the current generation of Aes Sedai. Just because its easy to make is not the same as it being a good idea to make them. No one among the current AS have raised the issue of is there any long term consequences to making lots and lots of Cuendillar?

I have always wondered if in making heartstone the channeler takes some of the OP and locks it up in the object created. How else could it be virtually indestructible unless the OP is constantly renewing it. If that were to be right making too many items could weaken the amount of OP available for Channelers to access not to mention effecting the turning of the wheel.

The way I see it both sides probably started off with a lot of cool toys but as RJ said the ability to travel left large aress devistated as there were not fixed battle lines. The infastructure to make cool items like shock lances broke down and they became harder and harder to make. Those already is existance could be damanged or destroyed in battle and it was harder and harder to replace them. The same could go for angreal & Sa'angreal so that by the time of the Strike having angreal was very important as there would not be enough to go around.

The forsaken being the forsaken probably meant that they all had angreal but they would have to give some to their soliders as well to offset those used by LTT's forces.

I don't think pride would come into it or admiting weakness by wearing openly angreal. The way I see it the Forsaken would flaunt their respective firepower to keep enemies/rivals at bay but from what we know of the DO he could well have ordered no angreal near SG.
Reply to message
How come every Forsaken wasn’t loaded with angreal when they were sealed in the Bore? - 07/05/2011 02:35:18 AM 2281 Views
Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 08:49:41 AM 1316 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 03:09:51 PM 1180 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 04:29:39 PM 1209 Views
No - 07/05/2011 08:36:49 PM 965 Views
Re: No - 07/05/2011 09:16:18 PM 950 Views
Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:07:31 PM 1008 Views
Re: Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:24:21 PM 1116 Views
Which would be a shame. - 09/05/2011 08:17:23 PM 959 Views
There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:08:53 PM 1178 Views
Re: There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:23:14 PM 998 Views
Yeah, but - 07/05/2011 07:30:45 PM 982 Views
They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 08:48:50 PM 1223 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 09:54:11 PM 1078 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 08/05/2011 05:48:01 PM 987 Views
Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM 1389 Views
Re: Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 10:02:40 AM 1145 Views
Meet malekithe. - 11/05/2011 08:06:01 PM 1027 Views
Meet Cannoli - 18/05/2011 07:47:46 AM 1330 Views
Re: Meet Cannoli - 19/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1272 Views
Whatever whatever! - 18/05/2011 07:43:31 AM 1128 Views
But the Dark One could control what the One Power did in Shayol Ghul - 11/05/2011 07:14:43 PM 1025 Views
it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 10:18:34 PM 993 Views
Re: it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 11:50:27 PM 970 Views
I was under impression they weren't very aware of the "destroying reality" part - 12/05/2011 06:06:56 AM 917 Views
yep (on both) *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:37:59 AM 502 Views
I think they were at least in some part - 12/05/2011 04:15:26 PM 859 Views
RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 02:13:15 PM 1092 Views
Re: I don't think so - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM 1147 Views
Good points - 08/05/2011 03:13:57 PM 972 Views
well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... - 09/05/2011 06:11:32 AM 1020 Views
Re: well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... - 09/05/2011 10:57:45 AM 1006 Views
I suppose that depends on what you want to get out of a fantasy book. *NM* - 09/05/2011 10:28:48 PM 540 Views
Do we really *know* that cuendiar is indestructble? - 10/05/2011 02:46:49 PM 993 Views
We don't, although simplicity=/=weakness. Another scenario - 10/05/2011 07:08:57 PM 886 Views
Sort of - 11/05/2011 07:49:10 AM 1316 Views
Re: RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 03:14:20 PM 1032 Views
Not plastic, more like electronics. - 11/05/2011 03:26:53 PM 1085 Views
I missed this post, it's very well thought! *NM* - 19/05/2011 11:26:00 AM 564 Views
my personal theory with other thoughts - 09/05/2011 08:10:34 PM 1029 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 02:10:13 AM 1012 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 08:07:50 AM 943 Views
Some people would. - 11/05/2011 02:42:25 PM 978 Views
Re: Some people would. - 11/05/2011 03:01:01 PM 891 Views
It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 03:45:45 PM 1050 Views
Re: It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 04:03:15 PM 864 Views
and if you had prophesy??? *NM* - 04/06/2011 03:10:40 AM 590 Views
My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers - 11/05/2011 07:24:34 PM 978 Views
makes sense *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:36:08 AM 527 Views
Er, though - - 16/05/2011 06:08:55 PM 940 Views
Re: Er, though - - 17/05/2011 12:38:14 PM 856 Views
Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:09:36 PM 1054 Views
Re: Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:15:53 PM 897 Views
I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 978 Views
Re: I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:49:53 PM 942 Views
That makes sense - 17/05/2011 02:16:05 PM 974 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 03:46:04 PM 876 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 04:21:11 PM 897 Views
Re: That makes sense - 18/05/2011 01:18:43 PM 928 Views
That scene was weird - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM 883 Views
Re: That scene was weird - 19/05/2011 10:41:59 AM 878 Views

Reply to Message