Active Users:832 Time:25/12/2024 01:42:00 AM
Here's a scary thought redqueen Send a noteboard - 28/04/2011 11:54:50 PM

Egwene will be alive for at least the next three hundred years, barring accidents. If Aes Sedai age in the same way as non-channelers, she could expect to be fertile for perhaps the next hundred of those years. So if she were that way inclined she could have sixty to seventy babies. Just think of the fun she'd have getting them all married into important families and manipulating the world to bring them power! The family of al'Vere will rule the world! >:D
Reply to message
Egwene vs. Gawyn (ToM spoilers of course) - 28/04/2011 05:01:46 AM 3979 Views
There's fifty feet of crap between rock bottom and your post... *NM* - 28/04/2011 07:40:04 AM 474 Views
Almost three days since the last post...at least I'm trying. - 28/04/2011 12:17:59 PM 943 Views
Sorry about that... - 28/04/2011 10:58:50 PM 1005 Views
Ah, its always good to see a good Egwene rant. Bravo! NM *NM* - 28/04/2011 01:58:46 PM 712 Views
Great work, Cannoli - 28/04/2011 02:09:28 PM 956 Views
Regarding the mother's permission.... - 28/04/2011 07:26:29 PM 1022 Views
while i agree with you on most of this - 28/04/2011 04:53:06 PM 1087 Views
hmpf, i post a good point and nothing - 28/04/2011 11:09:53 PM 865 Views
Everybody agrees with you, that's why there were no replies *NM* - 28/04/2011 11:29:13 PM 462 Views
Here's a scary thought - 28/04/2011 11:54:50 PM 1169 Views
OMGWTFBBQ!? - 28/04/2011 11:58:37 PM 926 Views
In regards to the letters... - 28/04/2011 05:28:13 PM 1133 Views
But Gawyn was not Egwene's subject - 28/04/2011 06:09:31 PM 944 Views
Which was why I thought it was appropriate, since he meant to act as Egwene's Warder. - 28/04/2011 06:19:53 PM 904 Views
The only issue is that Warders are not minions - they are honored junior partners. - 28/04/2011 07:39:18 PM 1063 Views
No, the junior partners are Accepted. Warders are essentially personal bodyguards and/or assistants. - 28/04/2011 08:00:17 PM 860 Views
Marriage - 28/04/2011 08:27:53 PM 887 Views
Accepted are not anything, let alone junior partners. Don't think N&E's experience was typical - 28/04/2011 09:32:22 PM 1091 Views
Here's the thing though... - 28/04/2011 11:20:32 PM 913 Views
No, but it's cute and quirky when Faile does it. - 29/04/2011 03:06:50 PM 1080 Views
But... - 29/04/2011 10:52:03 PM 876 Views
That's not really clear - 29/04/2011 11:41:20 PM 1006 Views
Actually, it is... - 30/04/2011 06:37:42 PM 1022 Views
Re: Actually, it is... - 30/04/2011 11:17:21 PM 899 Views
Didn't Siuan, Gareth and Gawyn tell her about the Bloodknife they encountered? - 02/05/2011 02:33:08 PM 906 Views
It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:10:23 PM 1212 Views
Re: It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:25:31 PM 1132 Views
thumbs up to you both *NM* - 28/04/2011 08:45:51 PM 445 Views
Re: It isn't the worst romance in WoT - 28/04/2011 08:46:37 PM 1030 Views
Galad is a great option for a political marriage - 28/04/2011 09:04:46 PM 896 Views
Yes, but... - 28/04/2011 09:40:39 PM 942 Views
but galad knew nothing of berelain's closeness to rand, so that couldn't have affected anything - 28/04/2011 10:12:23 PM 976 Views
Exactly - 28/04/2011 10:27:04 PM 823 Views
Yes. An often overlooked point is that ELAYNE, not Egwene, gains the most power in ToM - 28/04/2011 09:42:43 PM 1278 Views
Except... - 28/04/2011 11:16:25 PM 935 Views
Well... - 29/04/2011 12:14:42 AM 887 Views
Re: Well... - 29/04/2011 08:39:37 AM 877 Views
Except they're both really hot. - 28/04/2011 10:01:46 PM 1071 Views
They were naive - 28/04/2011 11:10:34 PM 900 Views
Re: They were naive - 29/04/2011 03:18:42 PM 1143 Views
I can only quibble; Egwene became so insufferable in ToM I'm convinced her fate will be unpleasant. - 04/05/2011 12:41:53 AM 1045 Views
Siuan... - 04/05/2011 05:42:59 AM 1045 Views
Re: Siuan screwed up big time. - 07/05/2011 03:35:46 AM 914 Views
Re: Siuan screwed up big time. - 12/05/2011 02:13:08 PM 902 Views
"McClellanesque", eh? I'll have to remember that one. - 16/05/2011 12:12:23 AM 1178 Views

Reply to Message