Active Users:619 Time:02/04/2025 07:22:51 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1667 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1012 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 446 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 943 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 451 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 794 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 449 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 496 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 547 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 498 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 509 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 450 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 500 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 809 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 443 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 455 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 921 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 464 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 823 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1110 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 432 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 436 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 443 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 486 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 819 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 493 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 761 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 448 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 449 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 443 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 417 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 851 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 813 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 803 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 473 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 882 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1344 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 848 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 999 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 934 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 845 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 824 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 983 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1221 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 819 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1001 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 744 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 818 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 712 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 926 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1051 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 849 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 943 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 730 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 820 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 419 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 785 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 746 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 917 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1003 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 802 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1061 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 865 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 813 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 464 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 426 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 431 Views

Reply to Message