Active Users:611 Time:24/02/2025 12:06:31 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1652 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 446 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 992 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 438 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 928 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 442 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 777 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 440 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 488 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 540 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 510 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 491 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 502 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 439 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 490 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 899 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 461 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 793 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 434 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 447 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 900 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 456 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 806 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1090 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 424 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 429 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 443 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 436 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 460 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 804 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 485 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 745 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 438 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 440 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 435 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 435 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 407 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 828 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 796 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 785 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 857 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 848 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 465 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 865 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1328 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 833 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 978 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 916 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 829 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 807 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 968 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1204 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 801 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 981 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 728 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 802 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 698 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 889 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1032 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 831 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 921 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 705 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 804 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 409 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 768 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 727 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 901 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 986 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 784 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1045 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 846 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 780 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 457 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 419 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 424 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes