Active Users:599 Time:18/12/2024 03:38:58 PM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1583 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 933 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 413 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 858 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 421 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 717 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 412 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 461 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 516 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 465 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 469 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 416 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 465 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 732 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 409 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 424 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 829 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 433 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 756 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1022 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 397 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 402 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 407 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 400 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 737 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 461 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 685 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 413 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 413 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 402 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 379 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 759 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 734 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 726 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 439 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 805 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1266 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 772 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 910 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 845 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 775 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 742 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 906 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1142 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 736 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 929 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 667 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 728 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 634 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 825 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 969 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 776 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 857 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 630 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 744 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 386 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 702 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 697 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 822 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 921 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 749 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 979 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 786 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 712 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 442 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 391 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 400 Views

Reply to Message