Hm, you never do see a female Whitecloak. Do they ever talk about why?
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 04:11:30 PM
1. Whitecloaks
2. Ash'aman
3. Stone dogs?
That's pretty pro-masculine if you ask me.
They don't seem misogynistic. Could it just be a strength-of-arms thing? Barring the Aiel (who are all super deadly tough-as-nails folk), and the women of Two Rivers in tSR for some weird reason, most non-channeling women in WoT aren't very soldier-like.
It could just be that we only see Whitecloak soldiers, and 99.9% of soldiers in this setting are men. The few women who do want to kill stuff with sharp objects have become hunters for the Horn, or Elayne's bodyguards, or knife experts.
I amuse myself.
What do you consider to be the most pro-masculine culture/country in WoT? The most anti-female?
19/09/2009 07:32:03 AM
- 1326 Views
What about male-only organizations?
19/09/2009 02:00:55 PM
- 701 Views
Yeah, Aiel warrior societies.
19/09/2009 03:44:36 PM
- 783 Views
Women are probably not up to the functions of the other societies physically.
21/09/2009 06:10:14 AM
- 588 Views
Hm, you never do see a female Whitecloak. Do they ever talk about why?
20/09/2009 04:11:30 PM
- 744 Views
I was taking you seriously
19/09/2009 03:29:16 PM
- 689 Views
So a post has to be ALL humor or none? I was kidding on the square anyway.
21/09/2009 06:13:40 AM
- 644 Views
No question.
19/09/2009 08:43:47 PM
- 772 Views
Well the Amadicia thing is really just a function of the channeling. The Children are like the Reds
21/09/2009 07:10:16 AM
- 582 Views
Re: Well the Amadicia thing is really just a function of the channeling...
28/09/2009 06:24:19 PM
- 622 Views
The ogier all have masculine features.
19/09/2009 09:06:14 PM
- 800 Views
Do you have anything against paragraphs? *NM*
20/09/2009 10:03:48 PM
- 297 Views
I agree, but I also think there is a purpose.
21/09/2009 03:43:45 AM
- 620 Views
I think the Shienaran custom of protecting women is both patronizing and submissive ATST. *NM*
21/09/2009 02:33:58 PM
- 726 Views