Active Users:942 Time:15/11/2024 09:26:04 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM

I've received contact from a few posters who say that they're getting copies of TGS before the 27th of October. The spoiler policy at this moment is to ban all such information from being posted on the board.

Would you like the board to remain closed to these reviews until October 27, or would you like me to create a special area for them for people to read, if they want to?

If no, then all these people can read their advanced copies but post nothing about it until October 27. The advantage of this is that the board is kept clean of both good and false reviews. There are people who will post lies which could potentially contaminate the board, and create rumours on other sites as to the validity of our content i.e. make us a laughing stock.

If yes, I'll create an announced post for spoiler-free reviews of the new book. If anyone has read or claims to read the book before October 27, they can post there. Again, SPOILERS will still NOT be allowed, but these posters can post their spoiler-free reviews in this area. I'll also not defend the validity of any review, so you can read it at your peril. Don't be angry if a poster writes about the huge occurence in the early book surrounding Perrin, which just doesn't happen, and leaves you disappointed. Some posters also want to write vague details regarding the books i.e. how many chapters, maps, PoV's there are.

Examples of what you might see on this board...

- My spoiler-free review of TGS by Dragon21
- My own spoiler-free review of TGS by Hamhead
- Maps you can find in the new book by Jumpingjack


Examples of what you will not see on this board...

- My review of TGS *spoilers* *spoilers* by Jeff
- The Forsaken who die in TGS by Illiterateboy
- How TGS ends by Peterpumpkineater

Let me know what you think... I'm going to do this by popular demand. If the result is NO, it will be NO or vice-versa.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1576 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 415 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 923 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 408 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 844 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 413 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 711 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 408 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 459 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 511 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 483 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 459 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 465 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 411 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 458 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 829 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 441 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 724 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 405 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 419 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 821 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 426 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 745 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1013 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 391 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 396 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 410 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 401 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 397 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 726 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 457 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 670 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 408 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 410 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 403 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 399 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 374 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 747 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 722 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 715 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 822 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 774 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 434 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 796 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1256 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 763 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 897 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 837 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 763 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 731 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 893 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1131 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 724 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 912 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 648 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 717 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 622 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 816 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 958 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 761 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 845 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 618 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 728 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 378 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 691 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 684 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 810 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 913 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 737 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 963 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 777 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 706 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 436 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 386 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 395 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes