Active Users:417 Time:25/12/2024 12:45:36 AM
Re: Elaida Gerbeaud Send a noteboard - 11/04/2011 03:36:46 PM
I must admit, I was disappointed in the 'descent' of Elaida into a paranoid, frothing madwoman. The Tower-split plotline would have been much less black-and-white if she'd been allowed to stay as the character we saw when she was newly raised - ferocious and stubborn, but not wholly unreasonable, and not incompetent. But a mixture Alviarin's manipulation and, I think, the Fain evil!whammy, sent her into something of a death spiral. Getting rid of her started to seem more like putting down a rabid dog - the best thing for everyone, including the dog.

Do you suppose, if she'd been raised at a more 'normal' time in Tower history, she would have been a good Amrylin? Or would her character flaws have caught up with her anyway?


I think that Fain's evil only magnified Elaida's existing characteristics which tended towards being power hungary and controlling. Alviarin also used these same weaknesses to manipulate Elaida.

I do not think that she would be a good Amrylin even in a "normal time" as she is too rigid in her opinions and interpretes events as she wishes them to be not as they really are.
Reply to message
Elaida - 09/04/2011 02:40:45 PM 3172 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 03:16:09 PM 1286 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 08:56:46 PM 970 Views
Re: Elaida - 10/04/2011 10:58:57 AM 869 Views
Re: Elaida - 09/04/2011 07:38:47 PM 964 Views
Even before she became a caricature, she didn't exactly look all that capable - 10/04/2011 08:24:48 PM 917 Views
Well, that depends. - 10/04/2011 10:16:07 PM 907 Views
Re: Elaida - 11/04/2011 03:36:46 PM 892 Views
Those traits prevent her from being a good leader. Maybe she'd become a good Sister in time. - 11/04/2011 06:11:06 PM 795 Views
Re: Elaida never had to compromise before.... - 13/04/2011 11:59:44 AM 865 Views
Perhaps. - 13/04/2011 04:23:45 PM 900 Views
Re: Perhaps. - 15/04/2011 10:38:30 AM 815 Views
Re: Perhaps. - 15/04/2011 07:51:24 PM 756 Views
Not really - 15/04/2011 10:22:12 PM 780 Views
Re: Not really - 16/04/2011 12:27:35 AM 773 Views
Re: Not really - 16/04/2011 10:00:44 AM 808 Views
Surprised - 17/04/2011 10:22:41 AM 826 Views
Re: Surprised - 17/04/2011 10:57:03 AM 978 Views

Reply to Message